AJP - Heart Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (June 12, 2009). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00193.2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
297/2/H743    most recent
00193.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chicos, A. B
Right arrow Articles by Goldberger, J. J
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chicos, A. B
Right arrow Articles by Goldberger, J. J
Submitted on February 27, 2009
Revised on May 29, 2009
Accepted on June 9, 2009

Parasympathetic Effects on Cardiac Electrophysiology during Exercise and Recovery in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Alexandru B Chicos1, Prince J Kannankeril2, Alan H. Kadish1, and Jeffrey J Goldberger3*

1 Northwestern University
2 Vanderbilt
3 Northwestern University Medical School

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: j-goldberger{at}northwestern.edu.

Depressed parasympathetic activity has been proposed to be associated with an increased risk of sudden death. Parasympathetic effects (PE) on cardiac electrophysiology during exercise and recovery have not been studied in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. We performed non-invasive electrophysiologic studies (NI-EPS) and characterized the electrophysiological properties of the sinus node, atrioventricular (AV) node, and ventricle in subjects with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and dual-chamber defibrillators. NI-EPS was performed during rest, exercise and recovery at baseline and after parasympathetic blockade with atropine to assess PE (the difference between parameter values in the 2 conditions). Ten subjects (9 men, age 60±9 years, LVEF=29±8%) completed the study. All NI-EPS parameters decreased during exercise, and trended toward rest values during recovery. PE at rest, during exercise, and during recovery, respectively, on sinus cycle length were 320±71 ms (p=0.0001), 105±60 ms (p=0.0003), and 155±82 ms (p=0.0002); on AV block cycle length 137 ±136 ms (p=0.09), 37±19 ms (p=0.002), and 61±39 ms (p=0.006); on AV interval 58±32 ms (p=0.035), 22±13 ms (p=0.002), and 36±20 ms (p=0.001); on ventricular effective refractory period 15.8±11.3 ms (p=0.02), 4.7±15.2 ms (p=0.38), and 6.8±15.5 ms (p=0.20); on QT interval 13±12 ms (p=0.13), 3±17 ms (p=0.6), and 20±23 ms (p=0.04). In conclusion, we describe for the first time the changes in cardiac electrophysiology and PE during rest, exercise and recovery in subjects with left ventricular dysfunction. PE are preserved in these patients. Thus, the role of autonomic changes in the pathophysiology of sudden death requires further exploration.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.