AJP - Heart Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 234: H338-H345, 1978;
0363-6135/78 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boettcher, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Braunwald, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boettcher, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Braunwald, E.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 234, Issue 4 338-H345, Copyright © 1978 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Extent of utilization of the Frank-Starling mechanism in conscious dogs

D. H. Boettcher, S. F. Vatner, G. R. Heyndrickx and E. Braunwald

The extent to which an increase in preload increases left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic (ED) diameter (D) was studied in seven conscious dogs instrumented with ultrasonic D transducers and miniature LV pressure (P) gauges. Preload was elevated by three techniques: 1) volume loading with saline infusion, 2) induction of global myocardial ischemia by constricting the left main coronary artery, and 3) infusion of methoxamine. These three interventions increased LVEDP to over 30 mmHg from a control of 10 +/- 1 mmHg. With volume loading, LVEDD rose by only 1.55 +/- 0.39 mm from a control of 44.08 +/- 1.08 mm; with ischemia LVEDD rose by only .96 +/- .29 mm from a control of 42.55 +/- 2.18 mm, while with methoxamine LVEDD rose by only 1.34 +/- 0.38 mm from a control of 43.89 +/- 2.07 mm. In contrast, in the open-chest, anesthetized dog, LVEDD was greatly reduced and volume expansion resulted in a profound increase in LVEDD. Thus, the Frank-Starling mechanism is not an important controlling mechanism in the normal, reclining, conscious animal, since LVEDD appears to be near maximal at rest and does not increase substantially despite striking increases in LVEDP.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. R. Mitchell, W. A. Whitelaw, R. Sas, E. R. Smith, J. V. Tyberg, and I. Belenkie
RV filling modulates LV function by direct ventricular interaction during mechanical ventilation
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): H549 - H557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online