AJP - Heart Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 234: H392-H398, 1978;
0363-6135/78 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kent, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Covell, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kent, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Covell, J. W.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 234, Issue 4 392-H398, Copyright © 1978 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Comparison of left ventricular free wall and septal diastolic compliance in the dog

R. S. Kent, T. E. Carew, M. M. LeWinter and J. W. Covell

Septal to free wall dimensions are frequently employed for the analysis of diastolic compliance. However, the diastolic properties of these anatomically distinct regions of left ventricle are not well characterized. Regional compliance was studied in eight open-chest anesthetized dogs. Pairs of 2-mm-diameter piezoelectric crystals were implanted in the left ventricular free wall or septum 1.38 +/- 0.06 cm apart at a midwall location 58% +/- 1.9 of the left ventricular endocardial-epicardial or left ventricular endocardial-right ventricular endocardial distance. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was increased from an average of 8.1-21.0 mmHg, with a resulting average maximum end-diastolic strain of 11% (end-diastolic (ED) segment length/control ED length). Regional stiffness was assessed at all sites based on the relationship between left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and regional strain. Neither strain nor calculated stiffness coefficients differed significantly among the three sites. Septal transmural pressure (left ventricular end-diastolic pressure--right ventricular end-diastolic pressure) was nearly constant as left ventricular end-diastolic pressure increased during volume infusion and thus did not account for the observed septal strain.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online