AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 243: H379-H390, 1982;
0363-6135/82 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arts, T.
Right arrow Articles by Reneman, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arts, T.
Right arrow Articles by Reneman, R. S.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 243, Issue 3 379-H390, Copyright © 1982 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Epicardial deformation and left ventricular wall mechanisms during ejection in the dog

T. Arts, P. C. Veenstra and R. S. Reneman

Significant differences between epicardial and endocardial systolic stress in the wall of the left ventricle (LV) have been predicted by various models of LV mechanics. Yet a model incorporating transmural differences in fiber orientation and torsion, defined as a rotation of the apex with respect to the base around the long axis of the LV, predicts transmural equalization of stress and shortening along the fiber direction during the ejection phase. this equalization is due to an interplay between torsion and myocardial contraction. To assess the model hypothesis, predicted epicardial deformation during the ejection phase was compared with that measured experimentally. For this purpose 45 sets of measurements were performed in four open-chest dogs using a triangular array of inductive gauges for the assessment of epicardial circumferential strain (epsilon c), base-to-apex strain (epsilon z), and shear angle (gamma). Changes in shear angle are directly related to LV torsion. LV end-diastolic pressure was varied over a wide range (0-15 mmHg) by volume loading and bleeding. In the control state, the slope of the shear angle vs. volume strain curve (volume strain = 2 epsilon c + epsilon z), which is related to contraction, was found to be 0.74 +/- 0.10 (mean +/- SD). This compares reasonably wih the mathematical model prediction of a slope of 0.67. Due to an interplay between torsion and contraction, left ventricular fiber stress and fiber shortening might be uniformly distributed across the wall.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online