AJP - Heart Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 243: H698-H707, 1982;
0363-6135/82 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gallagher, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gallagher, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, J., Jr

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 243, Issue 5 698-H707, Copyright © 1982 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Myocardial blood flow and function with critical coronary stenosis in exercising dogs

K. P. Gallagher, G. Osakada, M. Matsuzaki, W. S. Kemper and J. Ross Jr

Critical stenosis of coronary arteries does not alter myocardial blood flow (MBF) at rest, but eliminates hyperemia and corresponds to a degree of arterial narrowing that expends subendocardial vasodilator reserve. Because subepicardial vasodilator reserve remains with critical stenosis at rest, we tested the significance of this reserve in six exercising dogs chronically instrumented to measure MBF (microspheres), regional function (systolic wall thickening with sonomicrometers), and coronary blood flow velocity (CBFV, pulsed Doppler). Critical stenosis produced with a hydraulic occluder limited CBFV and mean MBF to the resting level during treadmill exercise, but MBF was maldistributed. Subendocardial MBF decreased 50% (P less than 0.05) and subepicardial MBF increased 104% (P less than 0.01) compared with resting control conditions, suggesting that a transmural "steal" phenomenon had occurred, with augmented MBF in the subepicardial region at the expense of subendocardial MBF. Systolic wall thickening decreased markedly from 31.5 +/- 6.8 to 9.4 +/- 2.0% (P less than 0.01) during exercise, indicating that use of subepicardial vasodilator reserve with critical stenosis had little sustaining effect on regional contractile performance. Rather, subepicardial vasodilator reserve is potentially deleterious, inasmuch as a steal effect could contribute to reduced subendocardial perfusion, the primary determinant of systolic wall thickening.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online