AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 243: H917-H926, 1982;
0363-6135/82 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keung, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Aronson, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keung, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Aronson, R. S.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 243, Issue 6 917-H926, Copyright © 1982 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Passive electrical properties of normal and hypertrophied rat myocardium

E. C. Keung, C. S. Keung and R. S. Aronson

We determined the electrical constants of epicardial and endocardial preparations from both normal and hypertrophied rat hearts. This was done by comparative analysis of the spatial decay of steady-state electronic voltage deflection produced by injection of a hyperpolarizing constant-current pulse. We used a two-dimensional finite disk model to obtain the apparent membrane resistance, (Rm)app, and internal longitudinal resistivity (Ri), (Rm)app was significantly larger in epicardial (565 +/- 222 omega . cm2) than endocardial (375 +/- 137) preparations from normal hearts. This regional difference disappeared in hypertrophied hearts (epicardium 421 +/- 138, endocardium 383 +/- 121 omega . cm2). Ri was similar for normal endocardial (272 +/- 169 omega . cm) and epicardial (326 +/- 152) preparations, as well as for hypertrophied endocardial (251 +/- 108) and epicardial (312 +/- 59) preparations. We determined the effective membrane capacity (Ceff) by measuring the ratio of applied charge to the displacement of membrane potential. Ceff was larger for normal hearts (epicardium 9.7 +/- 2.5 micro F/cm2, endocardium 7.5 +/- 3.0) than for hypertrophied hearts (epicardium 4.1 +/- 1.4, endocardium 4.7 +/- 1.2). From the values for Ceff we calculated the effective membrane resistance, (Rm)eff. (Rm)eff was larger for normal (epicardium 5,392 +/- 2,613 omega . cm2, endocardium 3,013 +/- 2,096) than for hypertrophied (epicardium 1,552 +/- 633, endocardium 1,838 +/- 826) preparations. Our results show that the amount of electrically effective membrane area is decreased in hypertrophied myocardium, despite the increased total area per hypertrophied cell. One functional implication of this finding is that activation of contraction by spread of surface electrical depolarization into the T-tubules may be impaired in hypertrophied cardiac muscle.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online