AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 244: H308-H311, 1983;
0363-6135/83 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lister, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lister, G.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 244, Issue 2 308-H311, Copyright © 1983 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Precautions for measuring blood flow during anemia with the microsphere technique

A. A. Rosenberg, M. D. Jones Jr, R. C. Koehler, R. J. Traystman and G. Lister

Preliminary data from a study of the effects of anemia on organ blood flow showed large discrepancies between cardiac output measured with the microsphere technique and simultaneous values calculated by the Fick principle. The most likely explanation was that the reference sample drawn according to our standard procedure underestimated the microsphere concentration in arterial blood, resulting in erroneously high blood flow values. In the present experiments we compared our usual reference sample, from a small catheter advanced from a peripheral artery into the brachiocephalic artery (withdrawal rate 1.3 ml/min), with a simultaneous sample from a larger catheter withdrawn at the much higher rate (7.89 ml/min). At hematocrits above 32%, microsphere concentrations from the two catheters were similar, but below 32% the concentration of microspheres in blood from the larger catheter was 30-50% more than from the smaller. The discrepancy was not altered by changing the injection site from left ventricle to left atrium and thus was probably not the result of poor mixing within the heart. It may have been the result of nonhomogeneous distribution of microspheres within larger vessels, perhaps as a consequence of laminar flow and axial streaming of both red blood cells and microspheres during anemia. Whatever the cause, it was possible to eliminate the difference by withdrawing from the smaller catheter at a more rapid rate (2.46 ml/min).





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online