AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 246: H435-H447, 1984;
0363-6135/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slinker, B. K.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slinker, B. K.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, J. E.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 246, Issue 3 435-H447, Copyright © 1984 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Mechanical determinants of transient changes in stroke volume

B. K. Slinker, K. B. Campbell, J. A. Ringo, P. A. Klavano, J. D. Robinette and J. E. Alexander

To better define beat-to-beat regulation of stroke volume (SV), the several-beat transient response of the left ventricle (LV) to sudden changes in hydraulic loading impedance was studied. Data were collected from eight canine isolated heart-lung preparations with controlled LV loading impedance. At a selected diastolic interval, a sudden increase in hydraulic loading resistance was induced. The resulting transient response in SV, end-diastolic pressure (EDP), and end-systolic pressure (ESP) was analyzed by comparing the relative predictive capability of six competing models, each incorporating different degrees of complexity in the relationship between SV and EDP and ESP. The basic model assumed linear LV pressure-volume relationships at both end diastole and end systole. Incorporation of nonlinear, end-state interaction or coronary perfusion pressure effects into the basic model did not improve predictive performance. Models incorporating SV and ESP of the preceding beat as well as ejecting beat ESP and EDP were consistently superior to all other models. The ranking of the relative influence of the determinants of SV was 1) ejecting beat ESP, 2) preceding beat ESP, 3) ejecting beat EDP, and 4) preceding beat SV.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online