AJP - Heart Myographs and Tissue organ baths
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 247: H52-H60, 1984;
0363-6135/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matsuzaki, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matsuzaki, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, J., Jr

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 247, Issue 1 52-H60, Copyright © 1984 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effects of beta-blockade on regional myocardial flow and function during exercise

M. Matsuzaki, J. Patritti, T. Tajimi, M. Miller, W. S. Kemper and J. Ross Jr

We examined the effects of a cardioselective beta-blocking drug on exercise-induced regional myocardial ischemia in 10 conscious dogs with chronic coronary artery stenosis. An ameroid constrictor, Doppler flowprobe, and hydraulic cuff were placed around the left circumflex coronary artery, and left ventricular pressure (LVP), systolic wall thickening (% delta WT; by sonomicrometry), and myocardial blood flow (MBF; microspheres) were measured during control standing, control treadmill exercise, and identical exercise after atenolol (1 mg/kg po). Prior to study, in every dog % delta WT and MBF in the ischemic area were normal at rest, indicating collateral development. During control exercise, % delta WT in the ischemic region markedly decreased from 27 to 4%, and transmural ischemia was evident in that region. Heart rate, systolic LVP, and LV (+)dP/dt were significantly lower during exercise after atenolol than during control exercise. % delta WT in the normal area was only 81% of that during control exercise, but dysfunction in the ischemic area was improved (77% increase compared with control exercise). Accompanying the improved function was a significant increase of MBF/beat and relative MBF in the ischemic zone; the endocardial-to-epicardial ratio increased from 0.27 to 0.47. Thus atenolol improved regional MBF distribution, thereby diminishing exercise-induced regional myocardial dysfunction and accelerating its recovery.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online