AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 247: H699-H708, 1984;
0363-6135/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Okada, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kitamura, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Okada, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kitamura, K.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 247, Issue 5 699-H708, Copyright © 1984 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Left ventricular function and muscle mechanics in hypertrophied rabbit heart

T. Okada, H. Okuyama, H. Mashima, H. Sato and K. Kitamura

Ventricular contractile performance was studied in relation to wall muscle mechanics in isolated rabbit left ventricles during pressure-overloaded hypertrophy. The isovolumic pressure-volume relation of the hypertrophied ventricle (LVH) shifted to the left and upward from the normal control (NC) (P less than 0.001), but calculated wall stress at each normalized circumferential length decreased in LVH. The pressure-ejection rate relation, determined accurately by velocity control technique, could be adequately approximated by a hyperbola. In LVH, the maximum pressure (Po) was larger (154.3 +/- 17.0 mmHg), whereas the maximum ejection rate (Vej max) was smaller (13.7 +/- 4.2 ml/s, P less than 0.001) than those for NC (127.7 +/- 23.3 mmHg and 22.3 +/- 5.7 ml/s, respectively). The pressure-stiffness relation was linear in both groups, but the vertical axis intercept increased, indicating increased resting stiffness in LVH. Ventricular volume stiffness vs. the mean wall stress relationship of LVH shifted upward, whereas the normalized wall muscle stiffness vs. the mean wall stress relationship of LVH showed a smaller slope. Thus the hypertrophied ventricle can maintain its pumping ability at normal or augmented levels with depressed contractile function of the wall muscle.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online