AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 253: H671-H679, 1987;
0363-6135/87 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Manuel, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Manuel, D. W.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 253, Issue 3 671-H679, Copyright © 1987 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Use of ultrasound for noninvasive study of blood vessel responsiveness

G. J. Stewart, M. C. Ziskin, R. G. Schaub, R. E. Cartee, C. M. Philips, E. A. Stone and D. W. Manuel

To provide a noninvasive means for studying individual macroscopic blood vessels, an ultrasound scanner was modified to provide a recording of blood vessel diameter. The instrument has A- and B-modes of signal display. The B-mode is used to position the probe and the A-mode to measure vessel diameter. The A-mode has two electronic gates for tracking the echo from each of two structures, i.e., near and far wall of vessel. The front gate was modified to pick up the falling rather than rising edge of a peak generated by the vessel wall. An analog signal proportional to the distance between gates was derived for recording with a strip-chart recorder. Probe holders were constructed to optimize positioning and holding of probe. Stability was excellent (reading varied 0.05 mm over 1 h). Axial resolution was between 0.3 and 0.73 mm. Discrepancy of measurements of plastic tubing made by ocular and ultrasound varied from 1.1 to 4.6%. Discrepancy with lightly fixed vessels was 2.7-8.2%. Ex vivo measurements on vessels with viable smooth muscle were more variable, perhaps because of actual change during measurements. Changes in vessel diameter induced by change in hydrostatic pressure and exposure to histamine were recorded.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online