AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 254: H148-H155, 1988;
0363-6135/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lopez, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lopez, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, W. J., Jr

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 254, Issue 1 148-H155, Copyright © 1988 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effect of intracarotid administration of ouabain in dogs

J. A. Lopez, A. D. Timmis, H. Garan, C. J. Homcy and W. J. Powell Jr
Cardiac Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.

Recent work has documented both centrally mediated vasoconstriction and, paradoxically, a withdrawal of sympathetic activity in response to cardiac glycosides. In the present study the possibility that these different neurogenic responses might be dose related was investigated by infusing ouabain (5, 10, and 20 micrograms) for 5 min into the right common carotid artery of 51 anesthetized mongrel dogs. Effects on vascular resistance in the isolated, separately perfused but innervated gracilis muscle were measured. A 5-microgram infusion of ouabain (n = 6) produced a prolonged decrease in gracilis vascular resistance (GVR) of 19.4 +/- 5.4% (SE) from 43.4 +/- 6.7 (SE) to 33.7 +/- 4.2 mmHg.ml-1.100 g muscle.min (resistance units, RU). This vasodilatory response was not present in nine additional dogs following denervation of the carotid bifurcation. A 10-microgram infusion had no significant effect on GVR (n = 5), but the 20-microgram infusion of ouabain (n = 8) caused a rapid increase in GVR from 42.1 +/- 5.0 to 47.6 +/- 5.7 RU, an increase of 14.4 +/- 5.6%, which was not influenced by denervation of the carotid bifurcation (n = 8). This vasoconstriction was transient returning toward the control levels by 20 min following the infusion. These data indicate important dose-related differences in vascular responses to ouabain that are directionally opposite and mediated by separate neurogenic mechanisms. At high doses a centrally mediated vasoconstriction dominates, whereas at low doses carotid bifurcation mediated vascular dilatation occurs.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online