AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 255: H679-H684, 1988;
0363-6135/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schipke, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Burkhoff, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schipke, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Burkhoff, D.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 255, Issue 3 679-H684, Copyright © 1988 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Interrelation between end-systolic pressure-volume and pressure-wall thickness relations

J. D. Schipke, J. Alexander Jr, Y. Harasawa, R. Schulz and D. Burkhoff
Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

We predicted the shape of the end-systolic pressure-thickness relationship (ESPTR) by modeling the left ventricle as thick-walled sphere. To test the validity of the predicted relationships, we then measured the ESPTR over wide volume ranges in seven isolated blood-perfused canine hearts. Both simulation and experiments demonstrated that the ESPTR is curvilinear. However, within a physiological left ventricular systolic pressure range (80-150 mmHg), the ESPTR was described reasonably well by a straight line. Within that pressure range, changes in left ventricular contractile state, assessed by slope changes of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship, were associated with almost parallel shifts in the ESPTR. In contrast, in a low pressure range (less than 80 mmHg), contractility changes were associated with slope changes of the ESPTR. We conclude that, in general, there are limitations in the application of ESPTR for assessing left ventricular contractility, but if the limitations are recognized and accounted for, then the ESPTR may be useful for assessing contractility changes in vivo.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online