AJP - Heart Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 256: H881-H889, 1989;
0363-6135/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tulenko, T. N.
Right arrow Articles by Santamore, W. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tulenko, T. N.
Right arrow Articles by Santamore, W. P.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 256, Issue 3 881-H889, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Mutual interaction of vasoconstriction and endothelial damage in stenotic arteries

T. N. Tulenko, D. Constantinescu, T. Kikuchi, R. H. Cox and W. P. Santamore
Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19129.

Coronary artery vasomotion may be important in the pathogenesis of angina pectoris. Numerous experimental studies demonstrated accentuated arterial vasomotion in endothelium-damaged vessels. We examined interactions of stenosis, arterial vasoconstriction, and endothelium denudation in a stenosed artery preparation in vitro. Canine carotid arteries and porcine coronary arteries were perfused with a physiological salt solution under constant pressure and a fixed distal resistance. Pressures at the proximal and distal ends of the artery, as well as the flow, were continuously recorded. Hemodynamic responses to serotonin, norepinephrine, and angiotensin II were separately studied. In intact arteries without stenosis, the agonists produced a 30-40% reduction in lumen diameter without altering flow or distal pressure. After a luminal stenosis was created, vasoconstriction produced by the agonists decreased flow and increased the pressure gradient across the stenosis. Flow decreased to (or near) zero, indicating occlusion at the stenotic site. After endothelial loss, this effect was amplified, demonstrating occlusion of the artery and suppression of the flow at significantly (P less than 0.05) lower concentrations of agonist (0.1-0.3) compared with endothelial intact arteries. These studies illustrate 1) the necessity for the presence of stenosis in large arteries for vasoconstriction to impair flow and 2) the protecting effect of intact endothelium in blunting the effects of arterial vasoconstriction in stenosed vessels. Through the reciprocal interaction of arterial stenosis, vasoconstriction, and endothelial damage, ischemic events associated with certain types of vasomotion can be explained.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. A. Spence, W. D. Montgomery, and W. P. Santamore
HIGH FLOW DEMAND ON SMALL ARTERIAL CORONARY BYPASS CONDUITS PROMOTES GRAFT SPASM
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 1995; 110(4): 952 - 962.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online