AJP - Heart Calcium Transients and Cell-Sarcomere
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 257: H297-H304, 1989;
0363-6135/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Talman, W. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Talman, W. T.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 257, Issue 1 297-H304, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effects of stimulation of fastigial nucleus on cerebral blood flow in cats

J. L. Williams, D. D. Heistad, J. L. Siems and W. T. Talman
Department of Internal Medicine, Veterans Administration Medical Center, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242.

The goal of this study was to examine effects of electrical stimulation of the rostral fastigial nucleus on cerebral blood flow. Anesthetized cats were studied, and arterial pressure and blood gases were maintained at control levels during fastigial stimulation. In one group, we measured vessel diameter and velocity of blood flow through a pial artery with a Doppler probe and calculated blood flow as the product of cross-sectional area and velocity. Electrical stimulation of the fastigial nucleus produced a small increase in pial arterial flow of 16 +/- 6% (means +/- SE, P less than 0.05). Pial vascular resistance increased during moderate hypertension and decreased during decreases in arterial pressure, which indicates that cerebral vascular responses were not impaired. In a second group, cerebral blood flow was measured with microspheres. Blood flow to the pons and medulla increased 25 +/- 11 and 21 +/- 11%, respectively, during stimulation of the fastigial nucleus, but blood flow to the cerebral cortex did not increase significantly. Stimulation produced decreases in flow to the renal cortex and duodenum of 39 +/- 10 and 39 +/- 15%, respectively, and flow to the heart increased 48 +/- 22%, which indicates that the stimulus was efficacious. Thus electrical stimulation of the rostral fastigial nucleus in cats elicits only a small increase in cerebral blood flow.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online