AJP - Heart AJP citation statistics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 260: H811-H820, 1991;
0363-6135/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Munch, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Longhurst, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Munch, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Longhurst, J. C.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 260, Issue 3 811-H820, Copyright © 1991 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Contrasting effects of vasopressin and angiotensin II on rabbit aortic baroreceptors

P. A. Munch and J. C. Longhurst
Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis 95616.

Arginine vasopressin (AVP) reportedly enhances, whereas angiotensin II (ANG II) attenuates, baroreflex control of the circulation. Here we examine whether these responses can be attributed, in part, to local actions on myelinated baroreceptor (BR) afferents, either directly or via changes in vascular tone. An in vitro rabbit aortic arch/aortic nerve preparation was used to study regularly discharging presumably myelinated BRs under controlled static and pulsatile pressures. At constant suprathreshold pressures, AVP (10(-13) M to 10(-6) M) had no effect on arch diameter or BR frequency, whereas equimolar concentrations of ANG II evoked dose-dependent vasoconstriction and associated BR inhibition. Differences were not caused by limited diffusion to BR endings lying outside the media, since similar results were obtained with either luminal or adventitial applications. AVP also had no effect on diameter or discharge in arches preconstricted with norepinephrine, whereas acetylcholine (ACh) relaxed the arch and thereby increased BR activity. These results eliminate possible AVP-induced endothelium-dependent vasodilation or potentiation of adrenergic vasoconstriction that would not be evident in isolated arches lacking tone. Finally, AVP did not sensitize BRs to changes in pressure, since ramp-evoked pressure-discharge curves remained constant and pulsatile discharge in response to sine-wave pressure inputs was unaltered. ANG II, however, shifted pressure-discharge curves to higher pressures and, with pulsatile inputs at constant mean pressure, reduced peak and average discharge firing rates. In conclusion, AVP has no apparent peripheral effect on aortic myelinated BRs in rabbits that could contribute to amplification of the baroreflex when AVP levels are elevated. In contrast, ANG II can inhibit BR firing as a consequence of local vasoconstriction, which may contribute to attenuation of the reflex when ANG II levels are elevated.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
U. C. Kopp, M. Z. Cicha, and L. A. Smith
Impaired responsiveness of renal mechanosensory nerves in heart failure: role of endogenous angiotensin
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2003; 284(1): R116 - R124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
U. C. Kopp, M. Z. Cicha, and L. A. Smith
Endogenous angiotensin modulates PGE2-mediated release of substance P from renal mechanosensory nerve fibers
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2002; 282(1): R19 - R30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online