AJP - Heart AJP: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 263: H1011-H1016, 1992;
0363-6135/92 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Su, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Crozatier, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Su, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Crozatier, B.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 263, Issue 4 1011-H1016, Copyright © 1992 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Limited left ventricular inotropic response to exercise in early phase of pressure overload in dogs

J. B. Su, L. Hittinger, P. Le Franc and B. Crozatier
Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale, Faculte de Medecine, Creteil, France.

To study the mechanisms of myocardial adaptation to increased stress in the early phase of left ventricular (LV) pressure overload, 12 dogs were instrumented with LV micromanometer, LV dimensional ultrasonic crystals, aortic catheter, and aortic occluder cuff. After recovery, animals performed graded exercise with acute aortic stenosis (AS) or sustained (24 h) aortic stenosis (SS). At baseline, LV functional parameters with SS were not different from those obtained with AS. LV peak pressure increased similarly during exercise with AS or SS, but LV peak dP/dt was lower with SS than with AS (peak values, 6,292 +/- 525 vs. 7,570 +/- 432 mmHg/s; P < 0.05). LV end-diastolic pressure increased from 9.7 +/- 1.7 to 21.4 +/- 3.3 mmHg (P < 0.05) during exercise with SS, but was unchanged with AS. The decrease of the time constant of isovolumic pressure fall during exercise was significantly smaller after SS than during AS (P < 0.05). In addition, the percentage of subendocardial wall thickening did not increase during exercise with SS (30.3 +/- 3.6%), while it increased significantly with AS (from 29.3 +/- 3.3 to 39.4 +/- 4.5%; P < 0.01). Plasma catecholamine levels were similar at baseline and increased to similar levels during exercise with AS and SS. In the early phase of pressure overload, we conclude that exercise capacity is maintained but that the LV inotropic response to exercise is modified with an altered relaxation process and a lesser utilization of subendocardial inotropic reserve.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online