AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 264, Issue 3 946-H959, Copyright © 1993 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Short time-scale LV systolic dynamics: pressure vs. volume clamps and effect of activation

S. G. Shroff, K. B. Campbell and R. D. Kirkpatrick
Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Illinois 60637.

We recently proposed a new model-based approach to quantifying short time-scale left ventricular (LV) systolic dynamics. In this study we examine the hypothesis that the quantitation of LV dynamics using the proposed approach is independent of external mechanical perturbations and the level of activation. Mechanical perturbation independence was assessed in seven isolated ferret hearts in which controlled changes in pressure (pressure clamp) or volume (volume clamp) were introduced at the time of peak isovolumetric pressure (protocol 1), and responses to these clamps were analyzed over the first 16 ms. The model described both pressure- and volume-clamps responses equally well. Model parameters were not different among various pressure clamps, and parameters estimated from volume clamps could accurately predict responses to pressure clamps [r2 range: 0.993-0.999; normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE) range: 2.35-5.86%]. To examine activation independence, volume- (4 hearts) and pressure-clamp (4 hearts) responses were obtained and analyzed for baseline and postextrasystolic potentiated beats in a manner similar to protocol 1. The model parameter values estimated from the baseline state accurately predicted responses for the postextrasystolic potentiated state (r2 and NRMSE range for volume-clamp data: 0.989-0.998 and 3.35-6.88%, respectively; r2 and NRMSE range for pressure-clamp data: 0.992-0.996 and 4.26-5.23%, respectively). Thus the proposed approach can dissect the contributions of changes in activation from those due to changes in contractile unit properties on the function of the intact LV.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. B. Campbell, A. M. Simpson, S. G. Campbell, H. L. Granzier, and B. K. Slinker Dynamic left ventricular elastance: a model for integrating cardiac muscle contraction into ventricular pressure-volume relationships J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2008; 104(4): 958 - 975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. B. Campbell, Y. Wu, A. M. Simpson, R. D. Kirkpatrick, S. G. Shroff, H. L. Granzier, and B. K. Slinker Dynamic myocardial contractile parameters from left ventricular pressure-volume measurements Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2005; 289(1): H114 - H130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Shimizu, K. Todaka, and D. Burkhoff Load dependence of ventricular performance explained by model of calcium-myofilament interactions Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2002; 282(3): H1081 - H1091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. S. Berger, S. K. Fellner, K. A. Robinson, K. Vlasica, I. E. Godoy, and S. G. Shroff Disparate effects of three types of extracellular acidosis on left ventricular function Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 1999; 276(2): H582 - H594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. S. Berger, K. Vlasica, C. M. Quick, K. A. Robinson, and S. G. Shroff Ejection has both positive and negative effects on left ventricular isovolumic relaxation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 1997; 273(6): H2696 - H2707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. B. Campbell, Y. Wu, R. D. Kirkpatrick, and B. K. Slinker Left ventricular pressure response to small-amplitude, sinusoidal volume changes in isolated rabbit heart Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 1997; 273(4): H2044 - H2061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. S. Berger, K. A. Robinson, and S. G. Shroff Wave Propagation in Coupled Left Ventricle–Arterial System : Implications for Aortic Pressure Hypertension, May 1, 1996; 27(5): 1079 - 1089. [Abstract] [Full Text]