AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 267: H684-H693, 1994;
0363-6135/94 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A corrigendum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peters, W.
Right arrow Articles by Gang, E. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peters, W.
Right arrow Articles by Gang, E. S.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 267, Issue 2 684-H693, Copyright © 1994 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Transmyocardial impedance during single and multiple internal ventricular defibrillation shocks

W. Peters, S. Solingen, Y. Kobayashi, R. Scharf, W. J. Mandel and E. S. Gang
Medizinische Klinik, Universitat Wurzburg, Germany.

Little is known about the transmyocardial impedance during internal ventricular defibrillation. In a canine model, using high rate on-line digitization, random shock delivery, and titanium electrodes, we determined the relationship among voltage, current, and impedance, delivered energy, and defibrillation success within the individual and within successive defibrillation shocks. Impedance decreased with repeated defibrillation in 10 of 11 dogs. Impedance always increased during trapezoidal discharges, whereas voltage decreased. Impedance was lower with high energy-voltage shocks in all dogs. Visually, voltage and current waveform did not show a phase shift. There was no difference in the total energy delivered and the energy converted into heat by the resistive part of the impedance. With a formula valid only for resistive loads, the capacitance of the defibrillator was calculated to be within the measurement accuracy and tolerance of the factory-provided value of 132 microF. Polarization voltage was consistently observed. Thus the transmyocardial impedance during defibrillation is primarily resistive, nonlinear voltage dependent, and declines with successive shocks. Defibrillation success was not influenced by these phenomena.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online