AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 271, Issue 3 1022-H1030, Copyright © 1996 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Invariance of the resistance to venous return to carotid sinus baroreflex control

T. Hatanaka, J. T. Potts and A. A. Shoukas
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.

Despite the well-established fact that the carotid sinus baroreflex system has profound control over the physical properties of the systemic circulation, the resistance to venous return (RVR) seems to be invariant of such control. We hypothesized that this apparent paradox may be explained from the baroreflex changes in systemic arterial compliance. In 12 pentobarbital-anesthetized mongrel dogs, RVR was measured at controlled carotid sinus pressures (CSP) of 50 and 200 mmHg with normal and artificially increased arterial compliance. Arterial compliance was determined from the arterial pressure decay when systemic blood flow was stopped with total vena caval occlusion. Changing CSP between 50 and 200 mmHg changed RVR significantly only under the condition of artificially increased arterial compliance. A four-parameter lumped model of the systemic circulation revealed that the baroreflex changes in arterial compliance and arterial resistance, which occurred in opposite directions, prevented a change in RVR when CSP was changed. The data also suggested that approximately 75% of RVR was attributed to large and conduit veins, the resistances along which were insensitive to baroreflex control. We concluded that the invariance of RVR results from a combination of 1) baroreflex change in the arterial compliance, 2) baroreflex insensitivity of the resistance along large and conduit veins, and 3) spatially distinct location between the major site of reflex change in capacitance and the major site of compliance.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. C. Tuday, J. V. Meck, D. Nyhan, A. A. Shoukas, and D. E. Berkowitz Microgravity-induced changes in aortic stiffness and their role in orthostatic intolerance J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2007; 102(3): 853 - 858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Rose The classical Guyton view that mean systemic pressure, right atrial pressure, and venous resistance govern venous return is/is not correct J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2007; 102(3): 1243 - 1243. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. J. Reddi and R. H. S. Carpenter Venous excess: a new approach to cardiovascular control and its teaching J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2005; 98(1): 356 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Aljuri and R. J. Cohen Theoretical considerations in the dynamic closed-loop baroreflex and autoregulatory control of total peripheral resistance Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): H2252 - H2273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. L. Brengelmann A critical analysis of the view that right atrial pressure determines venous return J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2003; 94(3): 849 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Potts, K. P. McKeown, and A. A. Shoukas Reduction in arterial compliance alters carotid baroreflex control of cardiac output in a model of hypertension Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 1998; 274(4): H1121 - H1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]