AJP - Heart AJP citation statistics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 271: H1094-H1098, 1996;
0363-6135/96 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murakawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Omata, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murakawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Omata, M.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 271, Issue 3 1094-H1098, Copyright © 1996 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Electrophysiological background of individual variability in electrical defibrillation efficacy

Y. Murakawa, T. Yamashita, K. Ajiki, K. Sezaki, Y. Kanese and M. Omata
Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tokyo, Japan.

This study was performed to test whether heart-to-heart variability of defibrillation efficacy is attributable to differences in postshock refractory state of nondepolarized myocardium. In 30 anesthetized dogs, a localized potential gradient was created using 1-16 V of stimulus across a pair of platinum plate electrodes on the right ventricle (5-mm interelectrode distance). The postshock recovery interval (PSRI) of the relatively refractory myocardium directly adjacent to the excited area was estimated by measuring the recovery interval after an appropriately timed field stimulus. The transcardiac defibrillation threshold (DFT) was also determined. The results showed that DFT normalized by the weight of the heart was inversely correlated with the PSRI measured with a field stimulus of 6 V (local shock intensity approximately 5 V/cm) or more (6 V: r = -0.502, P < 0.005; 16 V: r = -0.635, P < 0.0005). This observation suggests that variability of defibrillation efficacy in intact hearts is largely due to differences in the postshock refractory state of the nondepolarized myocardium.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online