AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 272, Issue 3 1359-H1363, Copyright © 1997 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Interaction of central venous pressure, intramuscular pressure, and carotid baroreflex function

X. Shi, B. H. Foresman and P. B. Raven
Department of Integrative Physiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth 76107, USA.

Seven healthy volunteer men participated in an experiment involving lower body positive pressure (LBPP) of 30 Torr and acute volume expansions of 5-6% (VE-I) and 9-10% (VE-II) of their total blood volume (TBV) to differentiate the effect of increased intramuscular pressure and central venous pressure (CVP) on the maximal gain (Gmax) of the carotid baroreflex. During each experimental condition, the heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP; intraradial artery or Finapres), and CVP (at the 3rd-4th intercostal space) were monitored continuously. Gmax was derived from the logistic modeling of the HR and MAP responses to ramped changes in carotid sinus transmural pressure using a protocol of pulsatile changes in neck chamber pressure from +40 to -65 Torr. The increase in CVP during +30-Torr LBPP was 1.5 mmHg (P < 0.05) and was similar to that observed during VE-I (1.7 mmHg, P > 0.05). The Gmax of the carotid baroreflex of HR and MAP was significantly decreased during LBPP by -0.145 +/- 0.039 beats x min(-1) x mmHg(-1) (38%) and -0.071 +/- 0.013 mmHg/mmHg (25%), respectively; however, VE-I did not affect Gmax. During VE-II, CVP was significantly greater than that elicited by LBPP, and the Gmax of the carotid baroreflex of the HR and MAP responses was significantly reduced. We conclude that carotid baroreflex responsiveness was selectively inhibited by increasing intramuscular pressure, possibly resulting in an activation of the intramuscular mechanoreceptors during LBPP. Furthermore, it would appear that the inhibition of the carotid baroreflex, via cardiopulmonary baroreceptor loading (increased CVP), occurred when a threshold pressure (CVP) was achieved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Di Rienzo, P. Castiglioni, F. Iellamo, M. Volterrani, M. Pagani, G. Mancia, J. M. Karemaker, and G. Parati Dynamic adaptation of cardiac baroreflex sensitivity to prolonged exposure to microgravity: data from a 16-day spaceflight J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2008; 105(5): 1569 - 1575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Ogoh, R. M. Brothers, Q. Barnes, W. L. Eubank, M. N. Hawkins, S. Purkayastha, A. O-Yurvati, and P. B. Raven Effects of changes in central blood volume on carotid-vasomotor baroreflex sensitivity at rest and during exercise J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2006; 101(1): 68 - 75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Charkoudian, E. A. Martin, F. A. Dinenno, J. H. Eisenach, N. M. Dietz, and M. J. Joyner Influence of increased central venous pressure on baroreflex control of sympathetic activity in humans Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2004; 287(4): H1658 - H1662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Pump, T. Kamo, A. Gabrielsen, P. Bie, N. J. Christensen, and P. Norsk Central volume expansion is pivotal for sustained decrease in heart rate during seated to supine posture change Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2001; 281(3): H1274 - H1279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. G. Querry, S. A. Smith, M. Stromstad, K. Ide, N. H. Secher, and P. B. Raven Anatomical and functional characteristics of carotid sinus stimulation in humans Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2001; 280(5): H2390 - H2398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q. Fu, Y. Sugiyama, A. Kamiya, A. S. M. Shamsuzzaman, and T. Mano Responses of muscle sympathetic nerve activity to lower body positive pressure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 1998; 275(4): H1254 - H1259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]