AJP - Heart AJP: Renal Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 273: H2620-H2626, 1997;
0363-6135/97 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kooner, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mathias, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kooner, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mathias, C. J.
Vol. 273, Issue 6, H2620-H2626, December 1997

Separation of peripheral and central cardiovascular actions of angiotensin II

Jaspal S. Kooner1, Clive N. May2, Stanley Peart3, and Christopher J. Mathias3

1 Department of Medicine, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom; 2 Howard Florey Institute of Physiology and Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia; and 3 Department of Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital Medical School, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom

The pressor and vasoconstrictor action of angiotensin II (ANG II) is considered to be caused by a combination of its direct and indirect vascular effects, the latter mediated by the sympathetic nervous system. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which the direct and indirect actions of ANG II contribute to its pressor and vascular effects. Blood pressure, cutaneous vascular, and plasma norepinephrine responses to intravenous ANG II were measured in conscious rabbits before and after inhibition of central sympathetic outflow with intravenous and intracisternal clonidine and after ganglionic blockade with intravenous pentolinium. Intravenous ANG II caused a similar dose-related rise in blood pressure before and after sympathetic blockade with intravenous clonidine, intracisternal clonidine, and intravenous pentolinium. In contrast, the dose-related fall in cutaneous ear blood flow and cutaneous ear temperature and rise in cutaneous ear vascular resistance induced by intravenous ANG II were abolished after intravenous clonidine, intracisternal clonidine, and intravenous pentolinium. Heart rate was unchanged after ANG II. There were no changes in back skin or rectal temperature. There was a nonsignificant fall in plasma norepinephrine and no change in epinephrine after ANG II. These results demonstrate that the acute pressor response to intravenous ANG II is mediated by its direct vascular effects and is not dependent on central or ganglionic stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system, in contrast to the effect of ANG II on cutaneous ear vasoconstriction, which is predominantly caused by a centrally mediated increase in sympathetic nervous activity. Our results separate, in conscious rabbits, the direct vascular effects of ANG II from its indirect vascular actions, which are mediated by central sympathetic stimulation in the brain.

blood pressure; cutaneous blood flow; direct vascular effect; sympathetic nervous system


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
L. Xu and A. F. Sved
Acute sympathoexcitatory action of angiotensin II in conscious baroreceptor-denervated rats
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2002; 283(2): R451 - R459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online