AJP - Heart Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 273: H2774-H2782, 1997;
0363-6135/97 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zakaria, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Flessner, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zakaria, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Flessner, M. F.
Vol. 273, Issue 6, H2774-H2782, December 1997

In vivo hydraulic conductivity of muscle: effects of hydrostatic pressure

El Rasheid Zakaria, Joanne Lofthouse, and Michael F. Flessner

Nephrology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York 14642

We and others have shown that the loss of fluid and macromolecules from the peritoneal cavity is directly dependent on intraperitoneal hydrostatic pressure (Pip). Measurements of the interstitial pressure gradient in the abdominal wall demonstrated minimal change when Pip was increased from 0 to 8 mmHg. Because flow through tissue is governed by both interstitial pressure gradient and hydraulic conductivity (K), we hypothesized that K of these tissues varies with Pip. To test this hypothesis, we dialyzed rats with Krebs-Ringer solution at constant Pip of 0.7, 1.5, 2.2, 3, 4.4, 6, or 8 mmHg. Tracer amounts of 125I-labeled immunoglobulin G were added to the dialysis fluid as a marker of fluid movement into the abdominal wall. Tracer deposition was corrected for adsorption to the tissue surface and for local loss into lymphatics. The hydrostatic pressure gradient in the wall was measured using a micropipette and a servo-null system. The technique requires immobilization of the tissue by a porous Plexiglas plate, and therefore a portion of the tissue is supported. In agreement with previous results, fluid flux into the unrestrained abdominal wall was directly related to the overall hydrostatic pressure difference across the abdominal wall (Pip = 0), but the interstitial pressure gradient near the peritoneum increased only ~40% over the range of Pip = 1.5-8 mmHg (20-28 mmHg/cm). K of the abdominal wall varied from 0.90 ± 0.1 × 10-5 cm2 · min-1 · mmHg-1 at Pip = 1.5 mmHg to 4.7 ± 0.43 ×10-5 cm2 · min-1 · mmHg-1 on elevation of Pip to 8 mmHg. In contrast, for the same change in Pip, abdominal muscle supported on the skin side had a significantly lower range of fluid flux (0.89-1.7 × 10-4 vs. 1.9-10.1 × 10-4 ml · min-1 · cm-2 in unsupported tissue). The differences between supported and unsupported tissues are likely explained in part by a reduced pressure gradient across the supported tissue. In conclusion, the in vivo hydraulic conductivity of the unsupported abdominal wall muscle in anesthetized rats varies with the superimposed hydrostatic pressure within the peritoneal cavity.

interstitium; convection; transport; solvent drag; peritoneal cavity


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. Waniewski, J. Stachowska-Pietka, and M. F. Flessner
Distributed modeling of osmotically driven fluid transport in peritoneal dialysis: theoretical and computational investigations
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2009; 296(6): H1960 - H1968.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. Stachowska-Pietka, J. Waniewski, M. F. Flessner, and B. Lindholm
Distributed model of peritoneal fluid absorption
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2006; 291(4): H1862 - H1874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
M. F. Flessner, J. Choi, H. Vanpelt, Z. He, K. Credit, J. Henegar, and M. Hughson
Correlating structure with solute and water transport in a chronic model of peritoneal inflammation
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2006; 290(1): F232 - F240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
M. F. Flessner
The transport barrier in intraperitoneal therapy
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): F433 - F442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
M. F. Flessner
Transport of protein in the abdominal wall during intraperitoneal therapy. I. Theoretical approach
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, August 1, 2001; 281(2): G424 - G437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. McGuire and F. Yuan
Quantitative analysis of intratumoral infusion of color molecules
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2001; 281(2): H715 - H721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
X.-Y. Zhang, J. Luck, M. W. Dewhirst, and F. Yuan
Interstitial hydraulic conductivity in a fibrosarcoma
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2000; 279(6): H2726 - H2734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
E. R. Zakaria, J. Lofthouse, and M. F. Flessner
Effect of intraperitoneal pressures on tissue water of the abdominal muscle
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2000; 278(6): F875 - F885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
E. R. Zakaria, J. Lofthouse, and M. F. Flessner
In vivo effects of hydrostatic pressure on interstitium of abdominal wall muscle
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 1999; 276(2): H517 - H529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online