AJP - Heart Calcium Transients and Cell-Sarcomere
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 275: H2236-H2242, 1998;
0363-6135/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lovich, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Edelman, E. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lovich, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Edelman, E. R.
Vol. 275, Issue 6, H2236-H2242, December 1998

Arterial heparin deposition: role of diffusion, convection, and extravascular space

Mark A. Lovich1, Mike Philbrook2, Sean Sawyer2, Ed Weselcouch2, and Elazer R. Edelman1,3

1 Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard University-Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139; 2 Focal, Incorporated, Lexington 02173; and 3 Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

Transvascular transport has been studied with atherogenic, tracer, and inert compounds such as low-density lipoprotein, horseradish peroxidase, and albumin, respectively. Few studies used vasoactive compounds, and virtually all studies examined entry from the lumen and not from the perivascular space. We compared several mechanisms that govern arterial heparin deposition after administration to the perivascular and endovascular aspects of the calf carotid artery in vitro and the rabbit iliac artery in vivo. In the absence of transmural hydrostatic pressure gradients, heparin deposition following endovascular administration was unaffected by deendothelialization and was indistinguishable from perivascular delivery. Deposition in the former was enhanced by the addition of a pressure gradient and to a greater extent in denuded arteries, indicating that convection influences transport but is dampened by the endothelium. Neither the endothelium nor the adventitia pose significant resistances to heparin. Deposition in vivo was greater following endovascular hydrogel release than perivascular application from similar devices to native or denuded arteries. The loss of drug to extra-arterial microvessels exceeded the loss of drug to the lumen flow. These findings are essential for describing vascular pharmacokinetics and for implementing local pharmacotherapies.

local drug delivery; transvascular transport; endovascular; perivascular; endothelium


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
C. J. Creel, M. A. Lovich, and E. R. Edelman
Arterial Paclitaxel Distribution and Deposition
Circ. Res., April 28, 2000; 86(8): 879 - 884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online