|
|
||||||||
1 Todd Franklin Cardiac
Research Laboratory, The Children's Heart Center, Department of
Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322;
2 Department of Medical
Physiology and Sports Medicine,
Previous work with model systems for action
potential conduction have been restricted to conduction between two
real cells or conduction between a model cell and a real cell. The
inclusion of additional elements to make a linear strand has allowed us to investigate the interactions between cells at a higher level of
complexity. When, in the simplest case of a linear strand of three
elements, the conductance between
elements
2 and
3 (GC2) is
varied, this affects the success or failure of propagation between
elements
1 and
2 (coupled by
GC1) as well as
the success or failure of propagation between
elements
2 and
3. Several major features were
illustrated. 1) When
GC1 was only
slightly greater than the coupling conductance required for successful
propagation between a model cell and a real cell, addition of a third
element of the strand either prevented conduction from
element
1 to
element 2 (when
GC2 was high) or
allowed conduction from element
1 to element
2 but not conduction from
element
2 to
element
3 (when GC2 was low).
2) For higher levels of
GC1, there was an
allowable "window" of values of
GC2 for
successful conduction from element 1 through to
element
3. The size of this allowable window
of GC2 values
increased with increasing values of
GC1, and this
increase was produced by increases in the upper bound of
GC2 values.
3) When the size of the central
element of the strand was reduced, this facilitated conduction through
the strand, increasing the range of the allowable window of
GC2 values. The
overall success or failure of conduction through a structure of cells
that has a spatially inhomogeneous distribution of coupling
conductances cannot be predicted simply by the average or the minimum
value of coupling conductance but may depend on the actual spatial
distribution of these conductances.
coupling conductance; cardiac action potential conduction
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. J. Jongsma and R. Wilders Gap Junctions in Cardiovascular Disease Circ. Res., June 23, 2000; 86(12): 1193 - 1197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Wagner, Y.-G. Wang, R. Kumar, D. A. Golod, W. N. Goolsby, and R. W. Joyner Measurements of calcium transients in ventricular cells during discontinuous action potential conduction Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2000; 278(2): H444 - H451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-G. Wang, R. Kumar, M. B. Wagner, R. Wilders, D. A. Golod, W. N. Goolsby, and R. W. Joyner Electrical interactions between a real ventricular cell and an anisotropic two-dimensional sheet of model cells Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2000; 278(2): H452 - H460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |