AJP - Heart  AJP: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 278: H360-H366, 2000;
0363-6135/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schöder, H.
Right arrow Articles by Czernin, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schöder, H.
Right arrow Articles by Czernin, J.
Vol. 278, Issue 2, H360-H366, February 2000

Regulation of myocardial blood flow response to mental stress in healthy individuals

Heiko Schöder, Daniel H. Silverman, Roxana Campisi, James W. Sayre, Michael E. Phelps, Heinrich R. Schelbert, and Johannes Czernin

Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, Ahmanson Biological Imaging Clinic, University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90095

Mental stress testing has been proposed as a noninvasive tool to evaluate endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotion. In patients with coronary artery disease, mental stress can induce myocardial ischemia. However, even the determinants of the physiological myocardial blood flow (MBF) response to mental stress are poorly understood. Twenty-four individuals (12 males/12 females, mean age 49 ± 13 yr, range 31-74 yr) with a low likelihood for coronary artery disease were studied. Serum catecholamines, cardiac work, and MBF (measured quantitatively with N-13 ammonia and positron emission tomography) were assessed. During mental stress (arithmetic calculation) MBF increased significantly from 0.70 ± 0.14 to 0.92 ± 0.21 ml · min-1 · g-1 (P < 0.01). Mental stress caused significant increases (P < 0.01) in serum epinephrine (26 ± 16 vs. 42 ± 17 pg/ml), norepinephrine (272 ± 139 vs. 322 ± 136 pg/ml), and cardiac work [rate-pressure product (RPP) 8,011 ± 1,884 vs. 10,416 ± 2,711]. Stress-induced changes in cardiac work were correlated with changes in MBF (r = 0.72; P < 0.01). Multiple-regression analysis revealed stress-induced changes in the RPP as the only significant (P = 0.0001) predictor for the magnitude of mental stress-induced increases in MBF in healthy individuals. Data from this group of healthy individuals should prove useful to investigate coronary vasomotion in individuals at risk for or with documented coronary artery disease.

age; gender; endothelial function


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P.C Strike and A Steptoe
Systematic review of mental stress-induced myocardial ischaemia
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2003; 24(8): 690 - 703.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online