AJP - Heart AJP: Endocrinology and Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 278: H998-H1007, 2000;
0363-6135/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miyashita, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sunagawa, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miyashita, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sunagawa, K.
Vol. 278, Issue 3, H998-H1007, March 2000

SPECIAL COMMUNICATION
A novel servo-control system that imposes desired aortic input impedance on in situ rat heart

Hiroshi Miyashita1,2, Masaru Sugimachi1, Takayuki Sato1, Toru Kawada1, Toshiaki Shishido1, Tsutomu Nakahara1, Ryoichi Yoshimura1, Hiroshi Takaki1, Hiroshi Miyano1, and Kenji Sunagawa1

1 Department of Cardiovascular Dynamics, National Cardiovascular Center Research Institute, Suita, Osaka 565-8565; and 2 Department of Physiology, Jichi Medical School, Minamikawachi-machi, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan

To clarify the pathophysiological role of dynamic arterial properties in cardiovascular diseases, we attempted to develop a new control system that imposes desired aortic impedance on in situ rat left ventricle. In 38 anesthetized open-chest rats, ascending aortic pressure and flow waveforms were continuously sampled (1,000 Hz). Desired flow waveforms were calculated from measured aortic pressure waveforms and target impedance. To minimize the difference between measured and desired aortic flow waveforms, the computer generated commands to the servo-pump, connected to a side branch of the aorta. By iterating the process, we could successfully control aortic impedance in such a way as to manipulate compliance and characteristic impedance between 60 and 160% of their respective native values. The error between desired and measured aortic flow waveforms was 70 ± 34 µl/s (root mean square; 4.4 ± 1.4% of peak flow), indicating reasonable accuracy in controlling aortic impedance. This system enables us to examine the importance of dynamic arterial properties independently of other hemodynamic and neurohumoral factors in physiological and clinical settings.

pressure and flow waveforms; dynamic afterload; iterative control algorithm; native aortic impedance





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online