AJP - Heart Calcium Transients and Cell-Sarcomere
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 279: H1949-H1954, 2000;
0363-6135/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tomiyama, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Todd, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tomiyama, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Todd, M. M.
Vol. 279, Issue 4, H1949-H1954, October 2000

Plasma viscosity and cerebral blood flow

Yoshinobu Tomiyama, Johnny E. Brian Jr., and Michael M. Todd

Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242

We hypothesized that the response of cerebral blood flow (CBF) to changing viscosity would be dependent on "baseline" CBF, with a greater influence of viscosity during high-flow conditions. Plasma viscosity was adjusted to 1.0 or 3.0 cP in rats by exchange transfusion with red blood cells diluted in lactated Ringer solution or with dextran. Cortical CBF was measured by H2 clearance. Two groups of animals remained normoxic and normocarbic and served as controls. Other groups were made anemic, hypercapnic, or hypoxic to increase CBF. Under baseline conditions before intervention, CBF did not differ between groups and averaged 49.4 ± 10.2 ml · 100 g-1 · min-1 (±SD). In control animals, changing plasma viscosity to 1.0 or 3.0 cP resulted in CBF of 55.9 ± 8.6 and 42.5 ± 12.7 ml · 100 g-1 · min-1, respectively (not significant). During hemodilution, hypercapnia, and hypoxia with a plasma viscosity of 1.0 cP, CBF varied from 98 to 115 ml · 100 g-1 · min-1. When plasma viscosity was 3.0 cP during hemodilution, hypercapnia, and hypoxia, CBF ranged from 56 to 58 ml · 100 g-1 · min-1 and was significantly reduced in each case (P < 0.05). These results support the hypothesis that viscosity has a greater role in regulation of CBF when CBF is increased. In addition, because CBF more closely followed changes in plasma viscosity (rather than whole blood viscosity), we believe that plasma viscosity may be the more important factor in controlling CBF.

brain; hemodilution; hypercapnia; hypoxia; oxygen


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
P. Cabrales and A. G. Tsai
Plasma viscosity regulates systemic and microvascular perfusion during acute extreme anemic conditions
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): H2445 - H2452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. Rebel, J. A. Ulatowski, H. Kwansa, E. Bucci, and R. C. Koehler
Cerebrovascular response to decreased hematocrit: effect of cell-free hemoglobin, plasma viscosity, and CO2
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2003; 285(4): H1600 - H1608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online