AJP - Heart Calcium Transients and Cell-Sarcomere
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 280: H2740-H2745, 2001;
0363-6135/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fauchère, J.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Grant, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fauchère, J.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Grant, D. A.
Vol. 280, Issue 6, H2740-H2745, June 2001

Right atrial pressure as measure of ventricular constraint in newborn lambs

Jean-Claude Fauchère, Adrian M. Walker, Elizabeth M. Skuza, and Daniel A. Grant

Ritchie Centre for Baby Health Research, Monash Institute of Reproduction and Development, Monash University, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria 3168, Australia

Although the lungs and pericardium constrain the heart and limit cardiac output, no method exists to assess this constraint in sick newborns. We hypothesize that a useful estimate of ventricular constraint may be obtained by measuring right atrial pressure (PRA) in the newborn. To test this hypothesis, we measured PRA, thoracic inferior vena caval pressure (PIVC; saline-filled catheters), and ventricular constraint (pericardial pressure, PPER; liquid-containing balloon) in 4-wk-old (neonatal, n = 12) and 3-day-old (newborn, n = 6) anesthetized lambs. The measurements were made while LV filling pressure was altered (0-20 mmHg) and while positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was maintained at 2.5 or 15 cmH2O. In all of the lambs, a strong linear relationship (r) existed between PRA and PPER (PRA = 1.19 PPER + 0.0, r = 0.99) and between PIVC and PPER (PIVC = 1.24 PPER + 0.1, r = 0.99; PEEP of 2.5 cmH2O). Similar relationships were also observed with increased PEEP (PRA = 1.29 PPER-1.2, r = 0.98 and PIVC = 1.32 PPER-1.2, r = 0.97). Because PRA provides an accurate measure of ventricular constraint in the normal lamb, it may be a useful measure of ventricular constraint in the sick newborn.

airway pressure; mechanical ventilation; pericardial pressure; positive end-expiratory pressure





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online