In the in vivo immature heart, conflicting results are reported for postischemic functional recovery. This study determines whether interpretations of functional recovery are influenced by the contractile performance index (systolic pressure, developed pressure, and maximum rate of systolic pressure increase per unit time) reported or the assessment technique (isovolumetric and variable-volume) utilized. In neonatal pigs (n = 6) on cardiopulmonary bypass, each performance index was examined using both assessment techniques before myocardial ischemia and at 15, 30, and 60 min of reperfusion. With the use of the isovolumetric technique, all performance indexes had significantly different recovery. With the use of the variable-volume assessment technique, recovery of systolic pressure was significantly better than the other indexes. When recovery was compared between the two assessment techniques, systolic pressure recovered significantly better when assessed using the variable-volume technique. For each performance index, the correlation between isovolumetric and variable-volume techniques was positive before ischemia but negative during reperfusion, suggesting that the assessment techniques identified conflicting postischemic contractile performances. Thus both the contractile performance index reported and the assessment technique employed are ultimately important in interpreting postischemic functional recovery in the immature heart.