|
|
||||||||
Division of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90048
The probabilistic nature of the
ventricular defibrillation threshold (DFT) remains poorly understood.
We hypothesized that shock outcome is a function of the amount of
myocardium in its vulnerable period (VP). The endocardial surface of
five isolated, perfused swine right ventricles was mapped with 477 bipolar electrodes during ventricular fibrillation (VF). Shock
parameters and VF cycle length were not significantly different in the
successful (S; n = 26) and failed (F; n = 26) trials. At the instant of the shock, the number of sites with 45- to 55-ms recovery was significantly smaller in the S trials than the F
trials (P < 0.04). No significant difference in the
number of sites with recovery intervals outside the 45- to 55-ms range
was seen in S and F shocks. Endocardial action potential showed that a
recovery time of 45-55 ms corresponded to the VP spanning
15 to
60 mV in 92% of the regenerative action potentials. We conclude that
the probabilistic nature of the DFT is related to the amount of
myocardium in its VP.
ventricular fibrillation; vulnerable period; action potential
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Huang, K.-A. Cheng, D. J. Dosdall, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker Role of maximum rate of depolarization in predicting action potential duration during ventricular fibrillation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): H2530 - H2536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Day, R. N. Doshi, P. Belott, U. Birgersdotter-Green, M. Behboodikhah, P. Ott, K. A. Glatter, S. Tobias, H. Frumin, B. K. Lee, et al. Inductionless or Limited Shock Testing Is Possible in Most Patients With Implantable Cardioverter- Defibrillators/Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillators: Results of the Multicenter ASSURE Study (Arrhythmia Single Shock Defibrillation Threshold Testing Versus Upper Limit of Vulnerability: Risk Reduction Evaluation With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations) Circulation, May 8, 2007; 115(18): 2382 - 2389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. White 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Physiologic and Educational Rationale for Changes Mayo Clin. Proc., June 1, 2006; 81(6): 736 - 740. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |