AJP - Heart BIOPAC complete lab solutions
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 284: H654-H667, 2003. First published October 3, 2002; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00594.2002
0363-6135/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
284/2/H654    most recent
00594.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Huesman, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Huesman, R. H.
Vol. 284, Issue 2, H654-H667, February 2003

Flow heterogeneity following global no-flow ischemia in isolated rabbit heart

Robert C. Marshall1,2, Patricia Powers-Risius1, Bryan W. Reutter1, Amy M. Schustz1, Chaincy Kuo1, Michelle K. Huesman1, and Ronald H. Huesman1

1 Department of Nuclear Medicine and Functional Imaging, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley 94720-8119; and 2 Martinez Veterans Affairs, Northern California Health Care System, Martinez, California 95616

The purpose of this study was to evaluate flow heterogeneity and impaired reflow during reperfusion after 60-min global no-flow ischemia in the isolated rabbit heart. Radiolabeled microspheres were used to measure relative flow in small left ventricular (LV) segments in five ischemia + reperfused hearts and in five nonischemic controls. Relative flow heterogeneity was expressed as relative dispersion (RD) and computed as standard deviation/mean. In postischemic vs. preischemic hearts, RD was increased for the whole LV (0.92 ± 0.41 vs. 0.37 ± 0.07, P < 0.05) as well as the subendocardium (Endo) and subepicardium considered separately (1.28 ± 0.74 vs. 0.30 ± 0.09 and 0.69 ± 0.22 vs. 0.38 ± 0.08; P < 0.05 for both comparisons, respectively) during early reperfusion. During late reperfusion, the increased RD for the whole LV and Endo remained significant (0.70 ± 0.22 vs. 0.37 ± 0.07 and 1.06 ± 0.55 vs. 0.30 ± 0.09; P < 0.05 for both comparisons, respectively). In addition to the increase in postischemic flow heterogeneity, there were some regions demonstrating severely impaired reflow, indicating that regional ischemia can persist despite restoration of normal global flow. Also, the relationship between regional and global flow was altered by the increased postischemic flow heterogeneity, substantially reducing the significance of measured global LV reflow. These observations emphasize the need to quantify regional flow during reperfusion after sustained no-flow ischemia in the isolated rabbit heart.

myocardium; microspheres; reperfusion





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online