AJP - Heart AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 288: H1057-H1062, 2005; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00625.2004
0363-6135/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McNulty, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Sinoway, L. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McNulty, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Sinoway, L. I.

TRANSLATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY

Effects of supplemental oxygen administration on coronary blood flow in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization

Patrick H. McNulty,1 Nicholas King,1 Sofia Scott,1 Gretchen Hartman,1 Jennifer McCann,1 Mark Kozak,1 Charles E. Chambers,1 Laurence M. Demers,2 and Lawrence I. Sinoway1

Departments of 1Medicine and 2Pathology, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania

Submitted 23 June 2004 ; accepted in final form 5 October 2004

Patients with heart disease are frequently treated with supplemental oxygen. Although oxygen can exhibit vasoactive properties in many vascular beds, its effects on the coronary circulation have not been fully characterized. To examine whether supplemental oxygen administration affects coronary blood flow (CBF) in a clinical setting, we measured in 18 patients with stable coronary heart disease the effects of breathing 100% oxygen by face mask for 15 min on CBF (via coronary Doppler flow wire), conduit coronary diameter, CBF response to intracoronary infusion of the endothelium-dependent dilator ACh and to the endothelium-independent dilator adenosine, as well as arterial and coronary venous concentrations of the nitric oxide (NO) metabolites nitrotyrosine, NO2, and NO3. Relative to breathing room air, breathing of 100% oxygen increased coronary resistance by ~40%, decreased CBF by ~30%, increased the appearance of nitrotyrosine in coronary venous plasma, and significantly blunted the CBF response to ACh. Oxygen breathing elicited these changes without affecting the diameter of large-conduit coronary arteries, coronary venous concentrations of NO2 and NO3, or the coronary vasodilator response to adenosine. Administering supplemental oxygen to patients undergoing cardiac catheterization substantially increases coronary vascular resistance by a mechanism that may involve oxidative quenching of NO within the coronary microcirculation.

endothelium; nitric oxide; acetylcholine; heart



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: P. H. McNulty, Division of Cardiology/H047, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 Univ. Dr., Hershey, PA 17033 (E-mail: pmcnulty{at}psu.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
P. H. McNulty, M. A. Tulli, B. J. Robertson, V. Lendel, L. A. Harach, S. Scott, and J. P. Boehmer
Effect of simulated postprandial hyperglycemia on coronary blood flow in cardiac transplant recipients
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): H103 - H108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
R. Beasley, S. Aldington, M. Weatherall, G. Robinson, and D. McHaffie
Oxygen therapy in myocardial infarction: an historical perspective
J R Soc Med, March 1, 2007; 100(3): 130 - 133.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.