|
|
||||||||
1Department of Medical Engineering and Systems Cardiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Okayama; 2Department of Physiology II, Okayama University Medical School, Shikata-cho, Okayama-shi, Okayama; 3Sensor Division, Engineering Operations, Nihon Kohden Corporation, Nishiochiai Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan; and 4Department of Physiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana
Submitted 20 November 2003 ; accepted in final form 12 November 2004
The subendocardium is the most vulnerable area of the left ventricle to the effects of hypoperfusion and ischemia. Despite this well-acknowledged observation, the mechanisms underlying this susceptibility are not elucidated, although numerous explanations including differences in transmural distribution of hemodynamics, metabolism, and wall stresses have been proposed. Our goal was to make dynamic measurements of endocardial and epicardial flow velocities, which reflect hemodynamic and wall stresses, to approach this problem. We measured blood flow velocities in subendocardial and subepicardial coronary arterioles of in vivo beating canine hearts using a high-speed, charge-coupled device, intravital videomicroscope with a rod-probe lens. Subendocardial flow was characterized by remarkable systolic flow-velocity reversal (systolic slosh ratio, 84%; measurable velocity of retrograde flow, faster than 40 mm/s), which contrasted to predominant forward-flow velocity during systole in the subepicardial arterioles (systolic slosh ratio, 25%; maximum velocity, approximately 20 mm/s; P < 0.0005 and 0.05 vs. subendocardial arterioles, respectively). We speculate that this retrograde flow is "wasteful," because this volume must be refilled during the subsequent diastole, which thereby detracts from the net perfusion as well as the time for perfusion. Accordingly, we also believe that the retrograde systolic blood flow contributes to the vulnerability of the subendocardium to ischemia.
microcirculation; circulation; rheology; ischemia
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Ashikaga, B. A. Coppola, K. G. Yamazaki, F. J. Villarreal, J. H. Omens, and J. W. Covell Changes in regional myocardial volume during the cardiac cycle: implications for transmural blood flow and cardiac structure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2008; 295(2): H610 - H618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Westerhof, C. Boer, R. R. Lamberts, and P. Sipkema Cross-talk between cardiac muscle and coronary vasculature. Physiol Rev, October 1, 2006; 86(4): 1263 - 1308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Rogers, T. Kiyooka, and W. M. Chilian Is there a need for another model on the pulsatile nature of coronary blood flow? Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2006; 291(3): H1034 - H1035. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Yalcin, F. Aydin, P. Ulker, M. Uyuklu, F. Gungor, J. K. Armstrong, H. J. Meiselman, and O. K. Baskurt Effects of red blood cell aggregation on myocardial hematocrit gradient using two approaches to increase aggregation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2006; 290(2): H765 - H771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |