HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 290/2/H624    most recent 00380.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Leung, M. C. H. Articles by Cameron, J. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Leung, M. C. H. Articles by Cameron, J. D.

Aortic stiffness affects the coronary blood flow response to percutaneous coronary intervention

Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash Medical Centre and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

Submitted 19 April 2005 ; accepted in final form 30 August 2005

We examined the hypothesis that a stiff aorta is associated with reduced coronary blood flow (CBF) and CBF response to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Aortic mechanical properties are thought to affect CBF, with increased stiffness associated with decreased coronary perfusion. Animal studies are conflicting, and human evidence is lacking. Even less is known about the effects of aortic stiffness on the CBF response to successful PCI. In 18 subjects undergoing elective PCI, a Doppler velocity guidewire was positioned proximal to a severe coronary stenosis to measure resting and adenosine-induced hyperemic CBF before and after PCI. Stenosis severity was assessed with Doppler velocity and pressure guidewires. Aortic mechanical indexes measured included central pulse-wave velocity (cPWV) and central pulse pressure (cPP). PCI was successful in all subjects (diameter stenosis: 88 ± 9% to 2 ± 7%; coronary flow velocity reserve: 1.8 ± 0.6 to 3.0 ± 0.8; fractional flow reserve: 0.57 ± 0.19 to 0.92 ± 0.06; all P < 0.001). With the adjustment for age and gender, resting and hyperemic CBF were inversely related to cPWV irrespective of the presence of stenosis (resting: before PCI, r² = 0.452, P < 0.01; after PCI, r² = 0.261, P = 0.043; hyperemic: before PCI r² = 0.503, P = 0.005; after PCI r² = 0.500, P = 0.002), whereas they were related to cPP in absence of stenosis (resting: r² = 0.368, P = 0.022; hyperemic: r² = 0.370, P = 0.016). Hyperemic CBF response (P = 0.005) and hyperemic CBF improvement from PCI (P = 0.025) were less marked in a stiff aorta than a compliant aorta. A stiff aorta is associated with a reduction in CBF, a lower hyperemic CBF response, and may reduce the improvement in hyperemic CBF after successful PCI.

aorta; elasticity; angioplasty; ischemia

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. E. Safar and P. Lacolley Disturbance of macro- and microcirculation: relations with pulse pressure and cardiac organ damage Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): H1 - H7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Nemes, T. Forster, and M. Csanady Relationship between coronary flow velocity reserve and aortic stiffness Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): H1311 - H1311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]