AJP - Heart Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 290: H1311, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01187.2005
0363-6135/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nemes, A.
Right arrow Articles by Csanády, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nemes, A.
Right arrow Articles by Csanády, M.

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Relationship between coronary flow velocity reserve and aortic stiffness

A. Nemes, Tamás Forster, and Miklós Csanády

Second Department of Medicine and Cardiology Center
University of Szeged
Szeged, Hungary
e-mail: nemes{at}in2nd.szote.u-szeged.hu

ABSTRACT

We examined the hypothesis that a stiff aorta is associated with reduced coronary blood flow (CBF) and CBF response to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Aortic mechanical properties are thought to affect CBF, with increased stiffness associated with decreased coronary perfusion. Animal studies are conflicting, and human evidence is lacking. Even less is known about the effects of aortic stiffness on the CBF response to successful PCI. In 18 subjects undergoing elective PCI, a Doppler velocity guidewire was positioned proximal to a severe coronary stenosis to measure resting and adenosine-induced hyperemic CBF before and after PCI. Stenosis severity was assessed with Doppler velocity and pressure guidewires. Aortic mechanical indexes measured included central pulse-wave velocity (cPWV) and central pulse pressure (cPP). PCI was successful in all subjects (diameter stenosis: 88 ± 9% to 2 ± 7%; coronary flow velocity reserve: 1.8 ± 0.6 to 3.0 ± 0.8; fractional flow reserve: 0.57 ± 0.19 to 0.92 ± 0.06; all P < 0.001). With the adjustment for age and gender, resting and hyperemic CBF were inversely related to cPWV irrespective of the presence of stenosis (resting: before PCI, r2 = 0.452, P < 0.01; after PCI, r2 = 0.261, P = 0.043; hyperemic: before PCI r2 = 0.503, P = 0.005; after PCI r2 = 0.500, P = 0.002), whereas they were related to cPP in absence of stenosis (resting: r2 = 0.368, P = 0.022; hyperemic: r2 = 0.370, P = 0.016). Hyperemic CBF response (P = 0.005) and hyperemic CBF improvement from PCI (P = 0.025) were less marked in a stiff aorta than a compliant aorta. A stiff aorta is associated with a reduction in CBF, a lower hyperemic CBF response, and may reduce the improvement in hyperemic CBF after successful PCI.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Nemes
Relationship between coronary microcirculatory function and aortic stiffness in diabetes.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2008; 51(5): 597 - 598.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.