| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
Submitted 24 October 2005 ; accepted in final form 19 December 2005
The objective of this study was to evaluate whether heart rate variability (HRV) can be used as an index of parasympathetic reactivation after exercise. Heart rate recovery after exercise has recently been shown to have prognostic significance and has been postulated to be related to abnormal recovery of parasympathetic tone. Ten normal subjects [5 men and 5 women; age 33 ± 5 yr (mean ± SE)] exercised to their maximum capacity, and 12 subjects (10 men and 2 women; age 61 ± 10 yr) with coronary artery disease exercised for 16 min on two separate occasions, once in the absence of atropine and once with atropine (0.04 mg/kg) administered during exercise. The root mean square residual (RMS), which measures the deviation of the R-R intervals from a straight line, as well as the standard deviation (SD) and the root mean square successive difference of the R-R intervals (MSSD), were measured on successive 15-, 30-, and 60-s segments of a 5-min ECG obtained immediately after exercise. In recovery, the R-R interval was shorter with atropine (P < 0.0001). Without atropine, HRV, as measured by the MSSD and RMS, increased early in recovery from 4.1 ± 0.4 and 3.7 ± 0.4 ms in the first 15 s to 7.2 ± 1.0 and 7.4 ± 0.9 ms after 1 min, respectively (P < 0.0001). RMS (range 1.7–2.1 ms) and MSSD were less with atropine (P < 0.0001). RMS remained flat throughout recovery, whereas MSSD showed some decline over time from 3.0 to 2.2 ms (P < 0.002). RMS and MSSD were both directly related (r2 = 0.47 and 0.56, respectively; P < 0.0001) to parasympathetic effect, defined as the difference in R-R interval without and with atropine. In conclusion, RMS and MSSD are parameters of HRV that can be used in the postexercise recovery period as indexes of parasympathetic reactivation after exercise. These tools may improve our understanding of parasympathetic reactivation after exercise and the prognostic significance of heart rate recovery.
heart rate variability; heart rate recovery; autonomic effects
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Ng, S. Sundaram, A. H. Kadish, and J. J. Goldberger Autonomic effects on the spectral analysis of heart rate variability after exercise Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2009; 297(4): H1421 - H1428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Buchheit, H. Al Haddad, P. B. Laursen, and S. Ahmaidi Effect of body posture on postexercise parasympathetic reactivation in men Exp Physiol, July 1, 2009; 94(7): 795 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Takahashi, K. Matsukawa, T. Nakamoto, H. Tsuchimochi, A. Sakaguchi, K. Kawaguchi, and K. Onari Control of heart rate variability by cardiac parasympathetic nerve activity during voluntary static exercise in humans with tetraplegia J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2007; 103(5): 1669 - 1677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Buchheit, P. B. Laursen, and S. Ahmaidi Parasympathetic reactivation after repeated sprint exercise Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): H133 - H141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Scott, B. T. A. Esch, M. J. Haykowsky, S. Isserow, M. S. Koehle, B. G. Hughes, D. Zbogar, S. S. D. Bredin, D. C. McKenzie, and D. E. R. Warburton Sex differences in left ventricular function and beta-receptor responsiveness following prolonged strenuous exercise J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2007; 102(2): 681 - 687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
