AJP - Heart BIOPAC complete lab solutions
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 291: H2547-H2549, 2006. First published June 23, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01248.2005
0363-6135/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/5/H2547    most recent
01248.2005v2
01248.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ninio, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Saint, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ninio, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Saint, D. A.

REPORTS

Passive pericardial constraint protects against stretch-induced vulnerability to atrial fibrillation in rabbits

Daniel M. Ninio and David A. Saint

School of Molecular and Biomedical Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Submitted 28 November 2005 ; accepted in final form 18 June 2006

Atrial fibrillation is more common in conditions with elevated atrial pressure and can be induced experimentally with acute increases in atrial pressure. We examined the effect of increased atrial pressure with and without pericardial constraint to better separate the effects of increased pressure and atrial stretch. In Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts with intact pericardium, after ligating the pulmonary and caval veins, intra-atrial pressures were increased in a stepwise manner by adjusting the pulmonary outflow cannula. Rapid burst pacing was applied to induce atrial fibrillation at increasing intra-atrial pressures from 0 to 24 cmH2O. The atrial refractory period was recorded at each pressure using a single extra stimulus. The protocol was repeated after the pericardium was removed. When the pericardium was intact, atrial stretch was limited by passive constraint, and sustained atrial fibrillation could not be induced despite atrial pressures in excess of 20 cmH2O. In contrast, when the pericardium was removed, atrial fibrillation could be reliably induced when atrial pressure exceeded 15 cmH2O. This suggests that the electrophysiological effects of acute atrial volume loading rely on atrial stretch rather than increased atrial pressure alone.

atrial refractory period; mechanoelectric feedback; Langendorff



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. M. Ninio, School of Molecular & Biomedical Science, Univ. of Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia (e-mail: daniel.ninio{at}adelaide.edu.au)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
K. Nishida, G. Michael, D. Dobrev, and S. Nattel
Animal models for atrial fibrillation: clinical insights and scientific opportunities
Europace, October 29, 2009; (2009) eup328v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
F. Lu, C. Jun-xian, X. Rong-sheng, L. Jia, H. Ying, Z. Li-qun, and D. Ying-nan
The effect of streptomycin on stretch-induced electrophysiological changes of isolated acute myocardial infarcted hearts in rats
Europace, August 1, 2007; 9(8): 578 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.