|
|
||||||||
1Department of Chemical Engineering, City College and Graduate School and University Center, City University of New York; and 2Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
Submitted 7 June 2005 ; accepted in final form 21 May 2006
In this study, filtration flows through the walls of the rat aorta, pulmonary artery (PA), and inferior vena cava (IVC), vessels with very different susceptibilities to atherosclerosis, were measured as a function of transmural pressure (
P), with intact and denuded endothelium on the same vessel. Aortic hydraulic conductivity (Lp) is high at 60 mmHg, drops
40% by 100 mmHg, and is pressure independent to 140 mmHg. The trends are similar in the PA and IVC, dropping 42% from 10 to 40 mmHg and flat to 100 mmHg (PA) and dropping 33% from 10 to 20 mmHg and essentially flat to 60 mmHg (IVC). Removal of the endothelium renders Lp(
P) flat: it increases Lp of the aorta by
75%, doubles Lp of the PA, and quadruples Lp of the IVC. Specific resistance (1/Lp) of the aortic endothelium is
47% of total resistance; i.e., the endothelium accounts for
47% of the
P drop at 100 mmHg. The PA value is 55% at >40 mmHg, and the IVC value is 23% at 10 mmHg. Lp of the intact aorta, PA, and IVC are order 108, 107, and 5 x 107 cm·s1·mmHg1, and wall thicknesses are 145.8 µm (SD 9.3), 78.9 µm (SD 3.3), and 66.1 µm (SD 4.1), respectively. These data are consistent with the different wall structures of the three vessels. The rat aortic Lp data are quantitatively consistent with rabbit Lp(
P) (Tedgui A and Lever MJ. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 247: H784H791, 1984; Baldwin AL and Wilson LM. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 264: H26H32, 1993), suggesting that intimal compression under pressure loading may also play a role in Lp(
P) in these other vessels. Despite very different driving
P, nominal transmural water fluxes of these three vessels are very similar and, therefore, cannot alone account for their differences in disease susceptibility. The different fates of macromolecular tracers convected by these water fluxes into the walls of these vessels may account for this difference.
transmural water flow; filtration; intima compression
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. L. Ritman and A. Lerman The dynamic vasa vasorum Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2007; 75(4): 649 - 658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Shou, K.-m. Jan, and D. S. Rumschitzki Transport in rat vessel walls. II. Macromolecular leakage and focal spot size growth in rat arteries and veins Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): H2881 - H2890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Zeng, Y. Yin, K.-M. Jan, and D. S. Rumschitzki Macromolecular transport in heart valves. II. Theoretical models Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): H2671 - H2686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Garanich, R. A. Mathura, Z.-D. Shi, and J. M. Tarbell Effects of fluid shear stress on adventitial fibroblast migration: implications for flow-mediated mechanisms of arterialization and intimal hyperplasia Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): H3128 - H3135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |