HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 294/1/H490    most recent 00046.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sundaram, S. Articles by Goldberger, J. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sundaram, S. Articles by Goldberger, J. J.

Autonomic effects on QT-RR interval dynamics after exercise

Bluhm Cardiovascular Center and the Division of Cardiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois

Submitted 12 January 2007 ; accepted in final form 1 November 2007

This study was designed to assess autonomic effects on the QT interval during recovery from exercise. Exercise is associated with an acute increased risk of sudden cardiac death. Evidence of impaired parasympathetic activity, such as low heart rate variability and heart rate recovery, and an increased QT interval are also associated with increased mortality. However, there is no clear pathophysiological link among these findings. Bicycle exercise testing was performed serially in 33 healthy volunteers (19 men; ages, 54 ± 7 yr) under four conditions: 1) baseline, 2) β-adrenergic blockade-intravenous propranolol (0.2 mg/kg) administered during exercise, 3) parasympathetic blockade-intravenous atropine (0.04 mg/kg) administered during exercise, and 4) double blockade with propranolol and atropine. ECGs were obtained every minute in recovery for 10 min and then at the 15th and 20th min, from which the QT and RR intervals were measured. Linear regression analyses were used to assess the individual QT-RR relationships for each subject for each condition. Relative to baseline, the QT-RR relationship with parasympathetic blockade was shifted to the left and had a steeper slope. In contrast, the QT-RR relationship with β-adrenergic blockade was shifted to the right and had a less steep slope. The baseline and double-blockade QT-RR relationships were in the middle and essentially superimposable. There was a negative relationship between QT-RR slope and heart rate or RR interval recoveries, but it was significant only for the 1- and 2-min RR interval recoveries with low R² values of 0.124 and 0.114. The main parasympathetic effect in the postexercise recovery period is to counteract the sympathetically mediated QT prolongation. These data support the concept that parasympathetic tone may provide a natural antiarrhythmic effect during this time.

parasympathetic; heart rate recovery; QT interval