HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 294/6/H2669    most recent 01372.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pyke, K. E. Articles by Tschakovsky, M. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pyke, K. E. Articles by Tschakovsky, M. E.

Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation during handgrip exercise: evidence for endothelial transduction of the mean shear stimulus

Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Submitted 27 November 2007 ; accepted in final form 7 April 2008

Exercise elevates shear stress in the supplying conduit artery. Although this is the most relevant physiological stimulus for flow-mediated dilation (FMD), the fluctuating pattern of shear that occurs may influence the shear stress-FMD stimulus response relationship. This study tested the hypothesis that the brachial artery FMD response to a step increase in shear is influenced by the fluctuating characteristics of the stimulus, as evoked by forearm exercise. In 16 healthy subjects, we examined FMD responses to step increases in shear rate in three conditions: stable shear upstream of heat-induced forearm vasodilation (FH_Stable); fluctuating shear upstream of heat-induced forearm vasodilation and rhythmic forearm cuff inflation/deflation (FH_Fluctuating); and fluctuating shear upstream of exercise-induced forearm vasodilation (FE_{Step Increase}). The mean increase in shear rate (±SD) was the same in all trials (FH_Fluctuating: 51.69 ± 15.70 s^–1; FH_Stable: 52.16 ± 14.10 s^–1; FE_{Step Increase}: 50.14 ± 13.03 s^–1 P = 0.131). However, the FH_Fluctuating and FE_{Step Increase} trials resulted in a fluctuating shear stress stimulus with rhythmic high and low shear periods that were 96.18 ± 24.54 and 11.80 ± 7.30 s^–1, respectively. The initial phase of FMD (phase I) was followed by a second, delayed-onset FMD and was not different between conditions (phase I: FH_Fluctuating: 5.63 ± 2.15%; FH_Stable: 5.33 ± 1.85%; FE_{Step Increase}: 5.30 ± 2.03%; end-trial: FH_Fluctuating: 7.76 ± 3.40%; FH_Stable: 7.00 ± 3.03%; FE_{Step Increase}: 6.68 ± 3.04%; P = 0.196). Phase I speed also did not differ (P = 0.685). In conclusion, the endothelium transduced the mean shear when exposed to shear fluctuations created by a typical handgrip protocol. Muscle activation did not alter the FMD response. Forearm exercise may provide a viable technique to investigate brachial artery FMD in humans.

Doppler ultrasound; mechanotransduction; forearm exercise; blood flow

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. H. J. Thijssen, M. M. van Bemmel, L. M. Bullens, E. A. Dawson, N. D. Hopkins, T. M. Tinken, M. A. Black, M. T. E. Hopman, N. T. Cable, and D. J. Green The impact of baseline diameter on flow-mediated dilation differs in young and older humans Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): H1594 - H1598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]