AJP - Heart Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 295: H1109-H1116, 2008. First published July 11, 2008; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00395.2008
0363-6135/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
295/3/H1109    most recent
00395.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baggish, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baggish, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, M. J.

The impact of endurance exercise training on left ventricular systolic mechanics

Aaron L. Baggish,1 Kibar Yared,1 Francis Wang,2 Rory B. Weiner,1 Adolph M. Hutter, Jr.,1 Michael H. Picard,1 and Malissa J. Wood1

1Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and 2University Health Services, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Submitted 15 April 2008 ; accepted in final form 7 July 2008

Although exercise training-induced changes in left ventricular (LV) structure are well characterized, adaptive functional changes are incompletely understood. Detailed echocardiographic assessment of LV systolic function was performed on 20 competitive rowers (10 males and 10 females) before and after endurance exercise training (EET; 90 days, 10.7 ± 1.1 h/wk). Structural changes included LV dilation (end-diastolic volume = 128 ± 25 vs. 144 ± 28 ml, P < 0.001), right ventricular (RV) dilation (end-diastolic area = 2,850 ± 550 vs. 3,260 ± 530 mm2, P < 0.001), and LV hypertrophy (mass = 227 ± 51 vs. 256 ± 56 g, P < 0.001). Although LV ejection fraction was unchanged (62 ± 3% vs. 60 ± 3%, P = not significant), all direct measures of LV systolic function were altered. Peak systolic tissue velocities increased significantly (basal lateral S'{Delta} = 0.9 ± 0.6 cm/s, P = 0.004; and basal septal S'{Delta} = 0.8 ± 0.4 cm/s, P = 0.008). Radial strain increased similarly in all segments, whereas longitudinal strain increased with a base-to-apex gradient. In contrast, circumferential strain (CS) increased in the LV free wall but decreased in regions adjacent to the RV. Reductions in septal CS correlated strongly with changes in RV structure ({Delta}RV end-diastolic area vs. {Delta}LV septal CS; r2 = 0.898, P < 0.001) and function ({Delta}peak RV systolic velocity vs. {Delta}LV septal CS, r2 = 0.697, P < 0.001). EET leads to significant changes in LV systolic function with regional heterogeneity that may be secondary to concomitant RV adaptation. These changes are not detected by conventional measurements such as ejection fraction.

athlete's heart; left ventricle; strain; ventricular interdependence



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: Aaron L. Baggish, Div. of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Yawkey Suite 5B, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114 (e-mail: abaggish{at}partners.org)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.