HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 295/6/H2436    most recent 00690.2008v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Ye, Y. Articles by Birnbaum, Y. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ye, Y. Articles by Birnbaum, Y.

Pioglitazone protects the myocardium against ischemia-reperfusion injury in eNOS and iNOS knockout mice

¹Division of Cardiology, ²Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and ³Graduate School of Biomedical Science, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas

Submitted 3 July 2008 ; accepted in final form 14 October 2008

Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activation with subsequent inducible NOS (iNOS), cytosolic phospholipase A₂ (cPLA₂), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) activation is essential to statin inhibition of myocardial infarct size (IS). In the rat, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- agonist pioglitazone (Pio) limits IS, upregulates and activates cPLA₂ and COX2, and increases myocardial 6-keto-PGF₁ levels without activating eNOS and iNOS. We asked whether Pio also limits IS in eNOS^–/– and iNOS^–/– mice. Male C57BL/6 wild-type (WT), eNOS^–/–, and iNOS^–/– mice received 10 mg·kg^–1·day^–1 Pio (Pio+) or water alone (Pio–) for 3 days. Mice underwent 30 min coronary artery occlusion and 4 h reperfusion, or hearts were harvested and subjected to ELISA and immunoblotting. As a result, Pio reduced IS in the WT (15.4 ± 1.4% vs. 39.0 ± 1.1%; P < 0.001), as well as in the eNOS^–/– (32.0 ± 1.6% vs. 44.2 ± 1.9%; P < 0.001) and iNOS^–/– (18.0 ± 1.2% vs. 45.5 ± 2.3%; P < 0.001) mice. The protective effect of Pio in eNOS^–/– mice was smaller than in the WT (P < 0.001) and iNOS^–/– (P < 0.001) mice. Pio increased myocardial Ser633 and Ser1177 phosphorylated eNOS levels in the WT and iNOS^–/– mice. iNOS was undetectable in all six groups. Pio increased cPLA₂, COX2, and PGI₂ synthase levels in the WT, as well as in the eNOS^–/– and iNOS^–/–, mice. Pio increased the myocardial 6-keto-PGF₁ levels and cPLA₂ and COX2 activity in the WT, eNOS^–/–, and iNOS^–/– mice. In conclusion, the myocardial protective effect of Pio is iNOS independent and may be only partially dependent on eNOS. Because eNOS activity decreases with age, diabetes, and advanced atherosclerosis, this effect may be relevant in a clinical setting and should be further characterized.

endothelial nitric oxide synthase; inducible nitric oxide synthase; peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-