AJP - Heart Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 296: H639-H644, 2009. First published January 9, 2009; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00496.2008
0363-6135/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Buy
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
296/3/H639    most recent
00496.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zierer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Moon, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zierer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Moon, M. R.

Interatrial shunt for chronic pulmonary hypertension: differential impact of low-flow vs. high-flow shunting

Andreas Zierer, Spencer J. Melby, Rochus K. Voeller, and Marc R. Moon

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

Submitted 12 May 2008 ; accepted in final form 29 December 2008

The purpose of the present study was to determine for the first time the qualitative and quantitative impact of varying degrees of interatrial shunting on right heart dynamics and systemic perfusion in subjects with chronic pulmonary hypertension (CPH). Eight dogs underwent 3 mo of progressive pulmonary artery banding, following which right atrial and ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic pressure-volume relations were calculated using conductance catheters. An 8-mm shunt prosthesis was inserted between the superior vena cava and left atrium, yielding a controlled model of atrial septostomy. Data were obtained 1) preshunt or "CPH"; 2) "Low-Flow" shunt; and 3) "High-Flow" shunt (occluding superior vena cava forcing all flow through the shunt). With progressive shunting, right ventricular pressure fell from 72 ± 19 mmHg (CPH) to 54 ± 17 mmHg (Low-Flow) and 47 ± 17 mmHg (High-Flow) (P < 0.001). Cardiac output increased from 1.5 ± 0.3 l/min at CPH to 1.8 ± 0.4 l/min at Low-Flow (286 ± 105 ml/min, 15% of cardiac output; P < 0.001), but returned to 1.6 ± 0.3 l/min at High-Flow (466 ± 172 ml/min, 29% of cardiac output; P = 0.008 vs. Low-Flow, P = 0.21 vs. CPH). There was a modest rise in systemic oxygen delivery from 252 ± 46 ml/min at CPH to 276 ± 50 ml/min at Low-Flow (P = 0.07), but substantial fall to 222 ± 50 ml/min at High-Flow (P = 0.005 vs. CPH, P < 0.001 vs. Low-Flow). With progressive shunting, bichamber contractility did not change (P = 0.98), but the slope of the right atrial end-diastolic pressure volume relation decreased (P < 0.04), consistent with improved compliance. This study demonstrated that Low-Flow interatrial shunting consistently improved right atrial mechanics and systemic perfusion in subjects with CPH, while High-Flow exceeded an "ideal shunt fraction".

right heart failure; atrial septostomy right ventricular overload



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. R. Moon, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington Univ. School of Medicine, 3108 Queeny Tower, #1 Barnes-Jewish Plaza, St. Louis, Missouri 63110-1013 (e-mail: moonm{at}wustl.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the American Physiological Society.