HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 296/3/H662    most recent 00322.2008v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Quick, C. M. Articles by Stewart, R. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Quick, C. M. Articles by Stewart, R. H.

Lymphatic pump-conduit duality: contraction of postnodal lymphatic vessels inhibits passive flow

Michael E. DeBakey Institute Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas

Submitted 27 March 2008 ; accepted in final form 29 December 2008

Lymphangions, the segments of lymphatic vessels between valves, exhibit structural characteristics in common with both ventricles and arteries. Although once viewed as passive conduits like arteries, it has become well established that lymphangions can actively pump lymph against an axial pressure gradient from low-pressure tissues to the great veins of the neck. A recently reported mathematical model, based on fundamental principles, predicted that lymphangions can transition from pump to conduit behavior when outlet pressure falls below inlet pressure. In this case, the axial pressure gradient becomes the major source of energy for the propulsion of lymph, despite the presence of cyclical contraction. In fact, flow is augmented when cyclical contractions are abolished. We therefore used an in vitro preparation to confirm these findings and to test the hypothesis that lymphangion contraction inhibits flow when outlet pressure falls below inlet pressure. Bovine postnodal mesenteric lymphatic vessels harvested from an abattoir were subjected to an inlet pressure of 5.0 cmH₂O and an outlet pressure that decreased from 6.5 to 3.5 cmH₂O under control conditions, stimulated with U-46619 (a thromboxane analog) and relaxed with calcium-free solution. Under control conditions, lymphatic flow markedly increased as outlet pressure fell below inlet pressure. In this case, the slopes of the flow versus axial pressure gradient increased with calcium-free conditions (61%, n = 8, P = 0.016) and decreased with U-46619 stimulation (21%, n = 5, P = 0.033). Our findings indicate that the stimulation of lymphatic contractility does indeed inhibit lymphatic flow when vessels act like conduits.

lymphangion conductance; contractility