AJP - Heart Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 297: H102-H108, 2009. First published May 8, 2009; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00256.2009
0363-6135/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
297/1/H102    most recent
00256.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doisne, N.
Right arrow Articles by Findlay, I.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doisne, N.
Right arrow Articles by Findlay, I.

Catecholaminergic automatic activity in the rat pulmonary vein: electrophysiological differences between cardiac muscle in the left atrium and pulmonary vein

Nicolas Doisne,1 Véronique Maupoil,1,2 Pierre Cosnay,1 and Ian Findlay1

1Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique FRE 3092, Faculté des Sciences, Université François-Rabelais and 2Laboratoire de Pharmacologie, Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques, Université François-Rabelais, Tours, France

Submitted 16 March 2009 ; accepted in final form 4 May 2009

Ectopic activity in cardiac muscle within pulmonary veins (PVs) is associated with the onset and the maintenance of atrial fibrillation in humans. The mechanism underlying this ectopic activity is unknown. Here we investigate automatic activity generated by catecholaminergic stimulation in the rat PV. Intracellular microelectrodes were used to record electrical activity in isolated strips of rat PV and left atrium (LA). The resting cardiac muscle membrane potential was lower in PV [–70 ± 1 (SE) mV, n = 8] than in LA (–85 ± 1 mV, n = 8). No spontaneous activity was recorded in PV or LA under basal conditions. Norepinephrine (10–5 M) induced first a hyperpolarization (–8 ± 1 mV in PV, –3 ± 1 mV in LA, n = 8 for both) then a slowly developing depolarization (+21 ± 2 mV after 15 min in PV, +1 ± 2 mV in LA) of the resting membrane potential. Automatic activity occurred only in PV; it was triggered at approximately –50 mV, and it occurred as repetitive bursts of slow action potentials. The diastolic membrane potential increased during a burst and slowly depolarized between bursts. Automatic activity in the PV was blocked by either atenolol or prazosine, and it could be generated with a mixture of cirazoline and isoprenaline. In both tissues, cirazoline (10–6 M) induced a depolarization (+37 ± 2 mV in PV, n = 5; +5 ± 1 mV in LA, n = 5), and isoprenaline (10–7 M) evoked a hyperpolarization (–11 ± 3 mV in PV, n = 7; –3 ± 1 mV in LA, n = 6). The differences in membrane potential and reaction to adrenergic stimulation lead to automatic electrical activity occurring specifically in cardiac muscle in the PV.

atrium; norepinephrine; electrophysiology; atrial fibrillation; thoracic veins



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: I. Findlay, CNRS FRE 3092, Faculté des Sciences, Parc de Grandmont, 37200 Tours, France (e-mail: findlay{at}univ-tours.fr)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the American Physiological Society.