Vol. 273, Issue 4, H1769-H1774, October 1997
Angiotensin II formation from ACE and chymase in human and
animal hearts: methods and species considerations
Eduardo
Balcells,
Qing C.
Meng,
Walter H.
Johnson Jr.,
Suzanne
Oparil, and
Louis J.
Dell'Italia
Birmingham Veteran Affairs Medical Center and Division of
Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, Vascular Biology and
Hypertension Program, and Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department
of Pediatrics, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama 35294
 |
ABSTRACT |
The current
study examined the contributions of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)
vs. chymase to angiotensin II (ANG II) generation in membrane
preparations from left ventricles of humans, dogs, rabbits, and rats
and from total heart of mice. ACE and chymase activity were measured in
membrane preparations extracted with low or high detergent (LD and HD,
respectively) concentrations. We hypothesized that ACE, which is
membrane bound in vivo, would be preferentially localized to the HD
preparation, whereas chymase, which is localized to the cytoplasm and
cardiac interstitium, would be localized to the LD preparation.
In human heart, ACE activity was 16-fold higher in the HD than in the
LD preparation, whereas chymase activity was 15-fold higher in
the LD than in the HD preparation. Total ANG II formation was greater
in human heart [15.8 ± 3.4 (SE) µmol ANG
II · g
1 · min
1]
than in dog, rat, rabbit, and mouse hearts (3.90 ± 0.35, 0.41 ± 0.02, 0.61 ± 0.07, and 1.16 ± 0.08 µmol ANG
II · g
1 · min
1,
respectively, P < 0.05, by
analysis of variance). ANG II formation from ACE was higher in mouse
heart (1.09 ± 0.05 µmol ANG
II · g
1 · min
1,
P < 0.001) than in rabbit, human,
dog, and rat hearts (0.55 ± 0.06, 0.34 ± 0.01, 0.32 ± 0.06, and 0.31 ± 0.02 µmol ANG
II · g
1 · min
1,
respectively). In contrast, chymase activity was higher in human heart
(15.3 ± 3.4 µmol ANG
II · g
1 · min
1)
than in dog, rat, rabbit, and mouse hearts (3.59 ± 0.29, 0.10 ± 0.01, 0.06 ± 0.01, and 0.07 ± 0.01 µmol ANG
II · g
1 · min
1,
respectively). Our results demonstrate important species differences in
the pathways of intracardiac ANG II generation. Chymase predominated over ACE activity in human heart, accounting for extremely high total
ANG II formation in human heart compared with dog, rat, rabbit, and
mouse hearts.
angiotensin-converting enzyme; detergent renin-angiotensin
system
 |
INTRODUCTION |
COMPONENTS OF THE renin-angiotensin system (RAS) have
been demonstrated in the heart by biochemical, immunohistochemical, and
molecular biologic techniques (12) and have been shown to be
upregulated in hearts that have developed pressure and volume overload-induced hypertrophy and failure (5, 9, 17, 22). Thus there is
increasing evidence that angiotensin II (ANG II) formation in the heart
is mediated by a local RAS, acts independently of the circulating RAS,
and is upregulated by hemodynamic stress. However, most research on the
intracardiac RAS in the basal state and under conditions of stress has
been performed in rodent models, and the relevance to humans has been
questioned, especially since there are multiple ANG II-forming pathways
in cardiac tissue that vary among species (4, 16). In particular, a
serine protease with extremely high affinity for ANG I,
"chymostatin-sensitive angiotensin-generating enzyme," has
recently been identified in the human (25), dog (1, 3), and baboon (6)
heart, but not in the rodent heart (7).
Human "heart chymase" has been purified, cloned, and sequenced
from the human heart (26). It is insensitive to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition, and the catalytic activity for conversion of
ANG I to ANG II is 20-fold higher for chymase than for ACE (8).
However, there has been controversy regarding the ANG II-forming
capacity of chymase vs. ACE in human heart tissue extracts. Urata and
co-workers (25) reported that this enzyme represents ~90% of the ANG
II-forming capacity in human heart tissue extracts solubilized with low
detergent concentration (0.01% Triton), suggesting that ACE is not the
major ANG II-forming enzyme in the human left ventricle in vitro. In
contrast, Zisman and co-workers (29) demonstrated >80% ANG II
formation from ACE in human heart tissue extracts solubilized with high
detergent concentration (0.6% Triton) and dialysis. However, Wolny and
co-workers (27) recently showed that solubilization with high
concentrations of detergent and dialysis result in a major loss of
chymase activity during sample preparation, thus providing a possible
explanation for underestimating chymase-mediated ANG II-forming
activity in the study of Zisman and co-workers. Taken together, these
studies demonstrate that ANG II-forming capacities of ACE and chymase
in cardiac tissue in vitro differ according to the method used to
process the tissue.
The controversy over the predominance of ACE- vs. chymase-induced ANG
II formation in heart tissue extracts may be related to the
localization of chymase and ACE in the heart. ACE is bound to cell
membranes of endothelial cells (10), whereas chymase is stored in
vesicles in the intracellular compartment of mast cells and other types
of interstitial cells in the heart (24). The presence of chymase in the
heart has raised important questions regarding the origin of ANG II and
the mechanism of action of ACE inhibitors, not only in the human heart
but also in animal models of hypertrophy and heart failure. ANG II
formation from ACE and chymase has not been systematically compared in
the human heart and in the hearts of various animal species. Thus the
purpose of the current investigation was to quantitate and compare ANG II-forming capacity of ACE and chymase in heart tissue from human, dog,
rat, mouse, and rabbit. We hypothesized that ACE, which is membrane bound in vivo, would be preferentially localized to the preparation with the high detergent concentration, whereas chymase, which is localized to the cytoplasm and cardiac interstitium, would be
localized to the preparation with the low detergent concentration.
 |
METHODS |
Tissue Procurement
Normal human donor hearts (n = 5) not
suitable for transplantation were obtained at the time hearts were
harvested for organ donation at the University of Alabama at
Birmingham. All hearts were kept in cold cardioplegia
solution from the time of removal, and tissue from the left ventricular
free wall was frozen in liquid nitrogen within 5-10 min. Hearts
from adult mongrel dogs (n = 5, 20-25 kg body wt) and rabbits (n = 3, 3-4 kg body wt; New Zealand White, Myrtles, Memphis, TN) were
obtained after a deep surgical plane of anesthesia was induced with
isoflurane inhalation anesthesia for the thoracotomy. Hearts were
arrested with a lethal dose of KCl, removed from the chest, rapidly
cooled in ice-cold phosphate buffer, and placed on a stainless steel
tray on ice. All animal hearts were dissected free of major blood
vessels, cardiac valves, atria, and right ventricle. Tissue from the
left ventricular midwall was frozen in liquid nitrogen within 2-5
min and stored at
80°C.
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 8, mean
weight 300 g) and male CD-1 mice (n = 6, mean weight 25 g) were purchased from Charles River Breeding
Laboratories (Wilmington, MA) and decapitated before removal of the
heart. Rat hearts were dissected free of cardiac valves, atria,
and right ventricle. The left ventricular free wall was frozen in
liquid nitrogen within 2-3 min and stored at
80°C.
Mouse hearts were frozen in toto in liquid nitrogen within 2-3 min
after decapitation and stored at
80°C.
The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board for Human
Use of the University of Alabama at Birmingham and by the Animal
Services Committees at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Cardiac Membrane Preparation
Low detergent concentration.
Membranes were prepared at 4°C in a manner similar to that
previously described in our laboratory (1, 3) and by Urata and
co-workers (25). Frozen heart tissue was homogenized with a Polytron
(Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) for 60 s in 100 mM potassium
phosphate buffer (PBS), pH 7.4 in a 10:1 volume ratio, then centrifuged
for 30 min at 44,000 g at 4°C with
0.01% Triton X-100. This procedure was repeated three times, and the
supernatant and pellet fractions were collected as fraction
supernatant 1 (S1) and pellet
1 (P1), respectively
(Fig. 1). ANG II-forming activity in
P1 was obtained from an aliquot of the
resuspended tissue pellet in 100 mM PBS (pH 8.3).
High detergent concentration.
The pellet fraction (P1), prepared
as described above, was resuspended in 1 ml of PBS buffer (pH 8.3) with
0.6% Triton X-100, vortexed for 3 min, and mechanically agitated for 4 h at 4°C. The tissue suspension was then centrifuged at 40,000 g for 30 min, and the supernatant and
pellet fractions were collected as fractions
S2 and
P2, respectively. ANG II-forming
activity in P2 was obtained from an
aliquot of the resuspended tissue pellet in 100 mM PBS (pH 8.3),
whereas an aliquot of the S2 fraction was assayed without further processing.
ANG II-Forming Activity From ACE and Heart Chymase
Aliquots (10 µl) were taken from each of the above fractions and
preincubated for 30 min at room temperature with an enzyme inhibitor
solution specific to chymase-like or ACE activity assays. For ANG
II-forming chymase activity assays, the inhibitor solution contained 2 mM EDTA, 100 µM captopril (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO), 1 mM
o-phenanthroline, and 20 µM
aprotinin with and without 100 µM chymostatin. For ANG II-forming ACE
activity assays, the inhibitor solution contained 1 mM
o-phenanthroline, 20 µM aprotinin, and 100 µM chymostatin with and without 100 µM captopril. Samples were then incubated for 60 min at 37°C with 600 µM ANG I (Sigma Chemical) in 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 8.3) solution containing 300 mM NaCl and 10
4 M ZnCl
(omitted from chymase activity assays) to a final total volume of the
reaction assay of 250 µl. Reactions were terminated by addition of
ice-cold ethanol in a 1:3 (vol/vol) sample-to-ethanol ratio.
Generated ANG II was quantitated using a reverse-phase Alltima 5-µm
phenyl-high-performance liquid chromatography column (Alltech Associates, Deerfield, IL), as previously performed in our laboratory (1, 3). The peak area corresponding to a synthetic ANG II standard was
integrated to calculate absolute ANG II formation. ANG II-forming
activity from ACE was defined as the captopril-inhibitable ANG II
formed, whereas chymase activity was defined as the
chymostatin-inhibitable ANG II formed. ACE and chymase-like activities
are expressed as moles of ANG II formed per gram of protein per minute
and protein content was determined by the method of Lowry and
co-workers (14).
Statistics
Values are means ± SE. Analysis of variance with Newman-Keuls post
hoc comparison was used to compare ANG II-forming capacity from ACE and
chymase in S1, S2, and
P2 of HD and LD cardiac
membrane preparations and total ANG II formation across species.
P < 0.05 was required to reject the
null hypothesis.
 |
RESULTS |
ANG II Formation From ACE and Chymase in the Human Heart
ANG II formation from chymase was higher in the low-detergent membrane
fractions (P1 and
P2: 15.3 ± 3.4 and 13.3 ± 2.9 µmol · g
protein
1 · min
1)
than in the high-detergent membrane fraction
(S2: 0.96 ± 0.21 µmol · g
protein
1 · min
1,
P < 0.001; Fig.
2A). In
contrast, ACE activity was higher in the high-detergent membrane
fraction (S2: 0.339 ± 0.008 µmol · g
protein
1 · min
1)
than in the low-detergent membrane fractions
(P1 and
P2: 0.022 ± 0.022 and 0.087 ± 0.056 µmol · g
protein
1 · min
1,
P < 0.01; Fig.
2B). Nevertheless, total ANG II
formation from chymase predominated over ANG II formation from ACE not
only in low-detergent membrane fractions
(P1 and
P2: 15.3 ± 3.4 and 13.3 ± 2.9 vs. 0.022 ± 0.022 and 0.087 ± 0.056 µmol · g
protein
1 · min
1)
but also in the high-detergent membrane fraction
(S2: 0.96 ± 0.21 vs. 0.339 ± 0.008 µmol · g
protein
1 · min
1).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
ANG II formation from chymase (A)
and angiotensin-converting enzyme
(B) in low- (0.01% Triton) and
high-detergent extraction (0.6% Triton) cardiac membrane preparations
of human heart tissue (n = 5), as
described in Fig. 1. * P < 0.001 (in A),
S2 < P1 and
P2.
* P < 0.01 (in
B),
S2 > P1 and
P2.
|
|
Species Differences in ANG II Formation
Total intracardiac ANG II formation from ACE and chymase was determined
utilizing the HD (S2) and LD
(P1) membrane preparations as
follows
The
percent ANG II formed from ACE was determined from ACE activity in the
high-detergent membrane fraction
(S2) divided by total ANG II
formation as defined above, whereas the percent ANG II formed from
heart chymase was determined from chymase activity in the low-detergent
membrane fraction (P1) divided by
total ANG II formation as defined above.
Figure 3 demonstrates that total ANG II
formation from ACE and chymase, as defined by the equation above, was
highly variable across species. Total ANG II formation was greater in
human and dog hearts (15.8 ± 3.4 and 3.90 ± 0.35 µmol · g
protein
1 · min
1,
respectively) than in rat, rabbit, and mouse hearts (0.41 ± 0.02, 0.61 ± 0.07, and 1.16 ± 0.08 µmol · g
protein
1 · min
1,
respectively), and this difference was due to greater chymase activity
(Fig.
4A). In
contrast, total ANG II formation from ACE did not differ among human,
dog, rat, and rabbit hearts (0.34 ± 0.01, 0.32 ± 0.06, 0.31 ± 0.02, and 0.55 ± 0.06 µmol · g
protein
1 · min
1,
respectively) but was higher in the mouse heart (1.09 ± 0.05 µmol · g
protein
1 · min
1,
P < 0.001; Fig.
4B). Taken together, percent ANG II
formation from chymase predominated over ACE in human (97.5 ± 0.2 vs. 2.5 ± 0.4%) and dog (92.3 ± 3.0 vs. 7.7 ± 2.3%)
hearts, whereas ACE predominated over chymase in rat (75.6 ± 1.5 vs. 24.4 ± 0.4%), rabbit (90.2 ± 5.7 vs. 9.8 ± 5.7%), and
mouse hearts (94.0 ± 0.6 vs. 6.0 ± 0.6%; Fig.
5).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Total ANG II formation in heart tissue from rabbit
(n = 3), rat
(n = 8), mouse
(n = 6), dog
(n = 5), and human
(n = 5).
* P < 0.05 vs. human;
# P < 0.05 vs. dog.
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
ANG II formation from chymase (A)
and angiotensin-converting enzyme
(B) from rabbit
(n = 3), rat
(n = 8), mouse
(n = 6), dog
(n = 5), and human
(n = 5).
* P < 0.05 vs. human;
# P < 0.05 vs. dog.
|
|

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Percent ANG II formed from angiotensin-converting enzyme (hatched bars)
and chymase (filled bars) in rabbit, rat, mouse, dog, and human
hearts.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The major finding of the current study was that ACE activity was
16-fold higher in high- than in low-detergent preparations, whereas chymase activity was 15-fold higher in low- than in
high-detergent human cardiac membrane preparations. By use of combined
high- and low-detergent membrane preparations, chymase predominated over ACE activity in human and dog hearts, whereas ACE was the predominant ANG II-forming mechanism in mouse, rat, and rabbit hearts.
The presence of chymase accounted for the extremely high total ANG II
formation in human heart compared with other species. Whether enhanced
ANG II formation from chymase in the human heart is of physiological or
pathophysiological significance is a source of controversy.
Studies in animals known to express chymase have yielded contradictory
results regarding the roles of ACE vs. chymase in ANG II formation. In
conscious baboons, intravenous infusion of the chymase-specific
substrate
[Pro11-D-Ala12]ANG
I resulted in increased left ventricular systolic and diastolic pressures consistent with arterial vasoconstriction (6). These effects
were antagonized by the ANG II receptor antagonist losartan but not by
an ACE inhibitor, thus demonstrating the in vivo contribution of
chymase to ANG II generation. In patients with peripheral vascular disease, maximal walking distance and subjective symptoms were improved
by nafamostat, a serine protease inhibitor (23). Isolated vascular ring
preparations of the human gastroepiploic arteries (16) and coronary
arteries (27) demonstrated that 40-90% of contraction was a
result of chymase-related ANG I conversion. The high tissue ANG
II-forming capacity in our samples is consistent with the important
functional effect of chymase-mediated ANG I conversion in the
vasculature of humans with peripheral vascular disease (23) and in the
human vascular ring preparations cited above (16, 27).
In contrast, other in vivo studies in the dog have demonstrated the
predominance of ACE-mediated ANG II formation across the coronary
circulation. We previously showed in the normal dog that >60% of ANG
II formation across the myocardial vascular bed was inhibited by
intracoronary infusion of captopril, whereas only 15% was inhibitable
by intracoronary infusion of chymostatin (1). In a similar fashion, the
fractional conversion of ANG I to ANG II across the myocardial
circulation in orthotopic heart transplant recipients was reduced by
89% during intracoronary infusion of enalaprilat (29). Taken together,
circulatory ANG I conversion appears to be predominantly ACE mediated
because of the location of ACE in endothelial cell membranes, with its
catalytic site exposed to the luminal surface, and the presence of ACE
in the plasma. In contrast, there is minimal chymase-mediated ANG I
conversion in the circulation, because
1) chymase is located in the
interstitium, within mast cells, and within endothelial cells with
secretion in the basolateral direction and
2) chymase is not present in the
plasma (25).
There has also been controversy regarding the ANG II-forming capacity
of chymase vs. ACE in human heart tissue extracts. Urata and co-workers
(25) reported that chymase represents ~90% of the ANG II-forming
capacity in human heart tissue extracts solubilized with low detergent
concentration (0.01% Triton), suggesting that ACE is not the major ANG
II-forming enzyme in human left ventricle in vitro. In contrast, Zisman
and co-workers (29) demonstrated >80% ANG II formation from ACE in
human heart tissue extracts solubilized with high detergent
concentration (0.6% Triton) and dialysis. Our results demonstrated
that ACE activity is 16-fold higher in high- than in low-detergent
cardiac membrane preparations, suggesting that the discordant results
of these two studies may be related to experimental design. Because ACE
is bound to cell membranes of endothelial cells, accessibility of ANG I
substrate to ACE may be decreased in low-detergent membrane
preparations. Indeed, Kinoshita and co-workers (11) demonstrated that
initial detergent extraction with 0.1% Triton X-100 during
purification of ACE from human lung tissue increased ACE activity
3.6-fold compared with the nonsolubilized tissue extract. Furthermore, Wolny and co-workers (27) demonstrated that solubilization and dialysis
during membrane preparation, as utilized in the study by Zisman and
co-workers, resulted in a >70% loss of chymase-mediated ANG II
generation in human heart tissue. Thus methods of handling during
biochemical assays can clearly affect enzymatic activity. Nevertheless,
our results demonstrated that ANG II formation from chymase was
threefold higher than ANG II formation from ACE, even in the
high-detergent cardiac membrane preparations (0.96 ± 0.21 vs. 0.339 ± 0.008 µmol · g
protein
1 · min
1;
Fig. 2) and is consistent with the greater activity of chymase than of
ACE in converting ANG I to ANG II (8).
In contrast to previous reports that the rodent heart lacks
chymase-like activity, our study demonstrated that 24% of ANG II-forming capacity of rat heart was inhibited by chymostatin. Recent
phylogenetic evidence indicates that mammalian chymases occur as two
distinct enzyme groups,
and
(2), which differ in their
substrate specificity.
-Chymases include human, dog, and rat
chymase-3, which convert ANG I to ANG II by cleaving the Phe8-His9
bond in ANG I (21). The ANG II generated is not further degraded, because its
Tyr4-Ile5
bond is resistant to cleavage by the
-chymases.
-Chymases (rat chymase-1 and -2 and mouse chymase-1, -2, -3, and -L) are
angiotensinases, because they readily cleave the
Tyr4-Ile5
and
Phe8-His9
bonds in angiotensins, thus inactivating them. The action of rat
chymase-3 could account for the chymostatin-inhibitable ANG II
formation in our rat heart assays. This may, in part, explain the
failure of ACE inhibitor therapy to attenuate pressure (15, 18, 28) and
volume (19) overload-induced left ventricular hypertrophy in the rat,
which has been observed in some studies. These findings suggest
incomplete inhibition of ANG II formation by ACE inhibitors
and/or additional ANG II-forming pathways. In addition, stretch
of neonatal rat myocytes has been shown to induce release of ANG II
that is independent of an increase in ACE activity and unaffected by
prior treatment with ACE inhibitor (20). Taken together, in vivo and in
vitro data suggest that there are non-ACE-dependent pathways of ANG II
formation in the rat heart that may be attributed to rat chymase-3.
Differences among species in the relative contributions of ACE and
chymase to ANG II formation in heart reflect the limitations of
extrapolating from animal models of heart failure and cardiac hypertrophy to the human. Use of ACE inhibitors in the routine treatment of heart failure makes this issue even more important, since
inhibition of intracardiac ACE with these drugs would increase ANG I
levels and shunt this substrate to chymase preferentially. Our results
suggest that ANG II-forming capacity in vitro should be assessed using
a combined approach that optimizes the conditions for membrane-bound
(ACE) and intracellular and interstitial (chymase) location of these
enzymes.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
The authors acknowledge the expert secretarial assistance of Cheryl
Myers.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
This study was supported by the Office of Research and Development,
Medical Service, Department of Veteran Affairs (L. J. Dell'Italia);
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant RO1-HL-54816 (L. J. Dell'Italia), Mechanisms of Hypertension and Cardiovascular Diseases
Grant 2T32-HL-O7457-16A1, and Specialized Center of Research Grant
HL-17667; and a grant from the American Heart Association Alabama
Affiliate.
Address for reprint requests: L. J. Dell'Italia, Div. of Cardiology,
Dept. of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 310 Lyons
Harrison Research Bldg., 701 South 19th St., Birmingham, AL 35294.
Received 12 March 1997; accepted in final form 9 June 1997.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Balcells, E.,
Q. C. Meng,
G. Hageman,
R. W. Palmer,
J. Durand,
and
L. J. Dell'Italia.
Angiotensin II formation in dog heart is mediated by different pathways in vivo and in vitro.
Am. J. Physiol.
271 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 40):
H417-H471,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2.
Chandrasekharan, U. M.,
S. Sanker,
M. J. Glynias,
S. S. Karnik,
and
A. Husain.
Angiotensin II-forming activity in a reconstructed ancestral chymase.
Science
271:
502-505,
1996[Abstract].
3.
Dell'Italia, L. J.,
Q. C. Meng,
E. Balcells,
I. M. Straeter-Knowlen,
G. Hankes,
R. Dillon,
R. E. Cartee,
R. Orr,
S. P. Bishop,
S. Oparil,
and
T. Elton.
Increased ACE and chymase-like activity in cardiac tissue of dogs with chronic mitral regurgitation.
Am. J. Physiol.
269 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 38):
H2065-H2073,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4.
Dzau, V. J.
Multiple pathways of angiotensin production in the blood vessel wall: evidence, possibilities and hypotheses.
J. Hypertens.
7:
933-936,
1989[Medline].
5.
Everett, A. D.,
A. Tufro-McReddie,
A. Fisher,
and
R. A. Gomez.
Angiotensin receptor regulates cardiac hypertrophy and transforming growth factor-
1 expression.
Hypertension
23:
587-592,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6.
Hoit, B. D.,
Y. Shao,
A. Kinoshita,
M. Gabel,
A. Husain,
and
R. A. Walsh.
Effects of angiotensin II generated by an angiotensin converting enzyme-independent pathway on left ventricular performance in the conscious baboon.
J. Clin. Invest.
95:
1519-1527,
1995.
7.
Husain, A.
The chymase-angiotensin system in humans.
J. Hypertens.
11:
1155-1159,
1993[Medline].
8.
Husain, A.,
A. Kinoshita,
S. S. Sung,
H. Urata,
and
F. M. Bumpus.
Human heart chymase.
In: The Cardiac Renin-Angiotensin System, edited by K. Lindpaintner,
and D. Ganten. Armonk, NY: Futura, 1994, p. 309-332.
9.
Iwai, N.,
H. Shimoike,
and
M. Kinoshita.
Cardiac renin-angiotensin system in the hypertrophied heart.
Circulation
92:
2690-2696,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10.
Johnston, C. I.
Tissue angiotensin converting enzyme in cardiac and vascular hypertrophy, repair, and remodeling.
Hypertension
23:
258-268,
1994[Free Full Text].
11.
Kinoshita, A.,
H. Urata,
M. Bumpus,
and
A. Husain.
Measurement of angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibition in the heart.
Circ. Res.
73:
51-60,
1993[Abstract].
12.
Lindpainter, K., M. Jin, M. J. Wilhelm, F. Suzuki, W. Linz, B. A. Schoelkens, and D. Ganten. Intracardiac
generation of angiotensin and its physiologic role.
Circulation 77, Suppl.: 1-18, 1988.
13.
Le Trong, H.,
H. Neurath,
and
R. G. Woodbury.
Substrate specificity of the chymotrypsin-like protease in secretory granules isolated from rat mast cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:
364-367,
1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14.
Lowry, O. H.,
N. J. Rosebrough,
A. T. Farr,
and
R. J. Randall.
Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.
J. Biol. Chem.
193:
265-275,
1951[Free Full Text].
15.
Mohabir, R.,
S. D. Young,
and
A. M. Strosberg.
Role of angiotensin in pressure overload-induced hypertrophy in rats: effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, an AT1 receptor antagonist, and surgical reversal.
J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol.
23:
291-299,
1994[Medline].
16.
Okunishi, H.,
Y. Oka,
N. Shiota,
T. Kawamoto,
K. Song,
and
M. Miyazaki.
Marked species difference in the vascular angiotensin II-forming pathways: humans vs. rodents.
Jpn. J. Pharmacol.
62:
207-210,
1993[Medline].
17.
Pieruzzi, F.,
Z. A. Abassi,
and
H. R. Keiser.
Expression of renin-angiotensin system components in the heart, kidneys, and lungs of rats with experimental heart failure.
Circulation
92:
3105-3112,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18.
Regan, C. P.,
P. G. Anderson,
S. P. Bishop,
and
K. H. Berecek.
Captopril prevents vascular and fibrotic changes but not cardiac hypertrophy in aortic-banded rats.
Am. J. Physiol.
271 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 40):
H906-H913,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19.
Ruzicka, M. B.,
E. Yuan,
E. Harmsen,
and
F. H. H. Leenen.
The renin-angiotensin system and volume overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy in rats. Effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor versus angiotensin II receptor blocker.
Circulation
87:
921-930,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20.
Sadoshima, J.,
Y. Xu,
H. S. Slayter,
and
S. Izumo.
Autocrine release of angiotensin II mediates stretch-induced hypertrophy of cardiac myocytes in vitro.
Cell
75:
977-984,
1993[Medline].
21.
Sanker, S.,
U. M. Chandrasekharan,
D. Wilk,
M. J. Glynias,
S. S. Karnik,
and
A. Husain.
Distinct multisite synergistic interactions determine substrate specificities of human chymase and rat chymase-1 for angiotensin II formation and degradation.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:
2963-2968,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22.
Schunkert, H.,
V. J. Dzau,
S. S. Tang,
A. T. Hirsch,
C. S. Apstein,
and
B. H. Lorell.
Increased rat cardiac angiotensin converting enzyme activity and mRNA expression in pressure overload left ventricular hypertrophy: effects on coronary resistance, contractility and relaxation.
J. Clin. Invest.
86:
1913-1920,
1990.
23.
Urabe, Y.,
M. Ideishi,
M. Sasaruri,
M. Ikeda,
and
K. Arakawa.
Beneficial effects of a serine protease inhibitor in peripheral vascular disease.
Am. J. Cardiol.
72:
218-222,
1993[Medline].
24.
Urata, H.,
K. D. Boehm,
A. Philip,
A. Kinoshita,
J. Gabrovsek,
F. M. Bumpus,
and
A. Hussain.
Cellular localization and regional distribution of an angiotensin II-forming chymase in the heart.
J. Clin. Invest.
91:
1269-1281,
1993.
25.
Urata, H.,
B. Healy,
R. W. Stewart,
F. M. Bumpus,
and
A. Husain.
Angiotensin II-forming pathways in normal and failing human hearts.
Circ. Res.
66:
883-890,
1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].
26.
Urata, H.,
A. Kinoshita,
K. S. Misono,
F. M. Bumpus,
and
A. Husain.
Identification of a highly specific chymase as the major angiotensin II-forming enzyme in the human heart.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:
22348-22357,
1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].
27.
Wolny, A.,
J. Clozel,
J. Rein,
P. Mory,
P. Vogt,
M. Turino,
W. Kiowski,
and
W. Fischli.
Functional and biochemical analysis of angiotensin II-forming pathways in the human heart.
Circ. Res.
80:
219-227,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].
28.
Zeirhut, W.,
H. G. Zimmer,
and
A. M. Gerdes.
Effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition on pressure-induced left ventricular hypertrophy.
Circ. Res.
69:
609-617,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
29.
Zisman, L. S.,
W. T. Abraham,
G. E. Meixell,
B. N. Vamvakias,
R. A. Quaife,
B. D. Lowes,
R. L. Roden,
S. J. Peacock,
B. M. Groves,
M. V. Raynolds,
M. R. Bristow,
and
M. B. Perryman.
Angiotensin II formation in the intact human heart.
J. Clin. Invest.
95:
1490-1498,
1995.
AJP Heart Circ Physiol 273(4):H1769-H1774