|
|
||||||||
2-Adrenergic autoreceptors
in A5 and A6 neurons of neonate rats
Department of Pharmacology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A5 noradrenergic
neurons control sympathetic outflow, nociception, and respiration. The
presence of
2-adrenergic
receptors (
2-ARs) in A5 cells
has been suggested by immunohistochemistry. In the present experiments,
we analyze the response of spinally projecting A5 cells to
2-AR agonists, and we compare
it with that of locus ceruleus (A6) neurons. Whole cell recordings were obtained from 52 spinally projecting neurons in the ventrolateral pons
of neonate rats. Immunohistochemistry showed that 60% of the recorded
cells were A5 cells. In A5 cells clamped at
55 mV, norepinephrine (NE) in the presence of the
1-AR antagonist prazosin produced a Ba2+-sensitive outward
current (20.4 ± 2.6 pA; n = 28).
The
2-AR-induced current
reversed at the K+ equilibrium
potential (EK)
at three different extracellular
K+ concentrations. Replacement of
82% of the extracellular Na concentration with
N-methyl-D-glucamine
did not change the reversal potential. The 19 presumably
noncatecholaminergic neurons responded weakly or not at all to NE
(2.5 ± 0.6 pA outward current). Pontospinal A6 neurons
(n = 11) were also recorded. Six A6
cells displayed large tetrodotoxin (TTX)-resistant membrane
oscillations. In these cells, the current induced by
2-AR stimulation did not
reverse over the voltages tested (
50 to
130 mV) or
reversed at potentials more negative than
EK (less than
114 mV). In A6 neurons that did not display large oscillations
(n = 5), the
2-AR-induced current reversed
at or close to the
EK (
90 ± 1.6 mV). In conclusion, A5 cells, like locus ceruleus neurons,
have
2-ARs that may function as
autoreceptors. In both cases,
2-AR activation increases an inwardly rectifying K+
conductance. In A5 cells, we found no evidence that
2-AR activation decreases a
resting Na+ conductance. The
inhibition of A5 cells by clonidine and other agents with
2-AR agonist activity is likely
to contribute to the ability of these drugs to decrease sympathetic
tone and arterial pressure.
A5 noradrenergic cells; locus ceruleus;
2-adrenergic receptors; autonomic regulations; sympathetic tone
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
THE RETICULAR FORMATION of the caudal ventrolateral
pons receives most of its input from brain stem areas that are involved in autonomic regulation (8). Stimulation of this region by microinjection of excitatory amino acids produces large cardiovascular changes in anesthetized rats (12, 22, 28) and changes in nociception
(6). Some of these effects are attributed to activation of the large
group of noradrenergic neurons known as the A5 cells. A5 cells project
predominantly to brain stem autonomic centers (8). They are among a
very small number of brain stem neurons that establish monosynaptic
connections with sympathetic preganglionic neurons (15, 16, 29). The
discharges of the bulbospinal neurons of the A5 region are influenced
by afferent inputs from the cardiopulmonary region, including arterial
baroreceptors and peripheral chemoreceptors (9, 13). Many of these
bulbospinal cells are very powerfully inhibited by systemic
administration of the
2-adrenergic-receptor
(
2-AR) agonist clonidine or by iontophoretic application of catecholamines (5, 13). A prior immunohistochemical study from this laboratory suggested that A5
neurons, like the C1 adrenergic cells of the rostral ventrolateral medulla, have postsynaptic
2A-ARs (27), a subtype of
adrenergic receptor (10), the integrity of which is required for the
efficacy of clonidine-like hypotensive agents (21). The objectives of the present study were threefold. The first was to determine whether A5
cells have
2-ARs. The second
was to determine whether the presence of these receptors is of
diagnostic value to distinguish between A5 cells and the
noncatecholaminergic component of the spinal projection of the
ventrolateral pons. The last objective was to analyze whether
2-adrenergic-receptor
stimulation produces the same or different effects in A5 cells and in
the reference noradrenergic cell group, the locus ceruleus.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Whole cell recordings were obtained at room temperature in thin coronal
brain slices (120 µm) from neonate rats (age 5-10 days). The
technique was identical to that previously used to record from C1
adrenergic neurons (19, 20). Briefly, ventrolateral pontine neurons
were retrogradely labeled with fluorescent microbeads injected on
postnatal day 3 into the thoracic
spinal area. Individual retrogradely labeled neurons were visualized
with a water-immersion ×40 objective via epifluorescence and
Hoffman modulation optics. All pertinent technical details regarding
the preparation of the slices can be found in the companion paper
(11a). For recording, the slice was continuously
superfused at the rate of 2-3 ml/min with a medium of the
following composition (in mM): 124 NaCl, 26 NaHCO3, 5 KCl, 1 NaH2PO4,
2 MgSO4, 2 CaCl2, and 10 glucose. This medium
was equilibrated with 95% O2-5%
CO2 (pH 7.4). In some experiments,
NaCl (124 mM) was replaced by an equimolar concentration of
N-methyl-D-glucamine
(NMDG) titrated with HCl. Drugs and solutions of different ionic
content were applied to the slice by switching the perfusion solution
with a series of electronic valves. Time to onset of drug action was
~30 s. Patch pipettes were filled with a solution of the following
composition (in mM): 114 K gluconate, 17.5 KCl, 4 NaCl, 4 MgCl2, 10 N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid, 0.2 ethylene glycol-bis(
-aminoethyl
ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid, 3 Mg2ATP, and 0.3 Na2GTP and 0.02% lucifer yellow
(Molecular Probes). Osmolarity was adjusted to 270 mosmol, and pH was
adjusted to 7.3. Electrode resistance was 5-7 M
. Whole cell
current- and voltage-clamp recordings were made with an Axoclamp-2A
amplifier. The liquid junction potential was measured (8-12 mV),
and all reported voltage measurements have been corrected for this
potential. Series resistance compensation was not employed because the
recorded currents were small enough (<100 pA) that voltage errors due
to series resistance should have been negligible. Current and voltage data were collected through a DigiData-1200 interface with pCLAMP software version 6.0 (Axon Instruments) and were stored on videotape for off-line analysis. In some experiments, the SD of the membrane potential was also used to quantify the variability of the resting membrane potential. In this case, a 100-s segment was used (sampling every 10 ms), and the signal was filtered from 0.1 to 50 Hz because power density spectral analysis revealed that most of the power was
distributed within this range.
After a recording was made, every slice was fixed in freshly prepared 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.3). Immunostaining for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) was done with a previously described technique (19, 20). The procedure is an avidin-biotin-based reaction (mouse anti-TH monoclonal antiserum from Chemicon, dilution 1:750; biotinylated goat anti-mouse antiserum from Vector, 1:150 dilution; and avidin-conjugated Texas red from Molecular Probes, 1:200 dilution). Recorded cells were identified by the presence of lucifer yellow and bulbospinal cells by the presence of microbeads. TH-immunoreactive (TH-ir) neurons were considered to be A5 neurons.
Drugs and chemicals. Tetrodotoxin (TTX), norepinephrine bitartrate (NE), clonidine HCl, 2-methoxyidazoxan (MOI), and NMDG were obtained from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO).
Statistics. Results are expressed as means ± SE. Data were analyzed by either paired t-tests or analysis of variance. Significance was set at P < 0.05.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Except where indicated, the use of the term A5 neuron is restricted to a spinally projecting neuron of the ventrolateral pons shown by post hoc immunohistochemistry to contain TH.
Effects of
2-AR
activation on spinally projecting neurons of the A5 region.
Postsynaptic
2-ARs were
selectively stimulated by exposing the cells to NE (30 µM, 30 s) in
the continuous presence of prazosin (1 µM) to block
1-adrenergic receptors and TTX
(1 µM) to reduce synaptic activity. The experiment was carried out in
52 spinally projecting cells that were voltage clamped at their resting
membrane potential (holding potential
50 to
60 mV) unless
otherwise indicated. After histology, 28 of 47 cells were found to be
TH-ir (A5) and 19 of 47 were not TH-ir. The 19 presumably
noncatecholaminergic neurons (without detectable TH-ir) responded
weakly or not at all to NE (2.5 ± 0.6 pA outward current, range
0-8 pA; P < 0.01 compared with
the response of A5 cells to be described below). In contrast, in all A5
cells (n = 28), NE produced a
relatively large outward current (20.4 ± 2.6 pA, range 6-60
pA) that peaked within 1 min of switching perfusion media and lasted
5-7 min (Fig. 1A).
In A5 cells, clonidine (1 µM) also elicited an outward current (13.3 ± 3.6 pA; n = 3) that lasted for
up to 15 min (not illustrated). The effect of NE was repeatable without
significant attenuation (first vs. second application, 23.0 ± 2.6 vs. 21.5 ± 2.5 pA; P = 0.45;
n = 7 neurons; Fig.
1A). In seven neurons, NE was
applied once, and after full recovery the catecholamine was reapplied in the presence of the selective
2-AR antagonist MOI (10 µM). The outward current induced by NE was blocked by the antagonist (22.8 ± 4.8 pA before and
0.8 ± 0.8 pA in presence of MOI;
P < 0.01;
n = 7 neurons; Fig. 1,
B and
C). Responsiveness to NE recovered
partially after a 0.5- to 1-h washout (38.6 ± 4.0% of control
value; n = 5 neurons). MOI alone did
not change the holding current. The outward current induced by 30 µM
NE at a holding potential of
50 to
60 mV was greatly
attenuated by the addition of 1 mM
Ba2+ to the perfusion solution
(26.2 ± 6.5 pA before and 3.0 ± 2.0 pA in presence of
Ba2+;
P < 0.01;
n = 6 neurons; an example of 1 cell is
shown in Fig. 2A),
suggesting that this current was due mostly to the activation of
K+ channels. To examine this point
further, the voltage dependence of the NE-induced current was examined
with a slow ramp paradigm (
80-mV linear ramp from resting
potential in 1 s). The current induced by NE was determined by
subtracting the control current-voltage (I-V)
curve from that determined in the presence of the catecholamine. Examples of
I-V
curves generated in the presence and absence of NE are illustrated in
Fig. 2B. The NE-induced current was
inwardly rectifying, and its polarity reversed at
83 mV. The
slope conductance measured in the linear part of the
I-V
curve (from
130 to
110 mV) was significantly increased by
NE (from 4.2 ± 0.3 to 6.4 ± 0.4 nS;
P < 0.01;
n = 22 cells). The relationship
between the reversal potential
(Erev) and the
K+ equilibrium potential
(EK) was
examined by applying NE in the presence of up to three different
K+ concentrations per cell as
illustrated in Fig. 2C. As indicated in Fig. 2D,
Erev was linearly
related to the logarithm of the external
K+ concentration (2.5 mM
K+:
98.8 ± 1.3 mV,
n = 8 cells; 5 mM
K+: 84.5 ± 0.6 mV,
n = 22 cells; 10 mM
K+: 64.6 ± 1.6 mV,
n = 8 cells). These
Erev values were
very close to the calculated
EK values
(
102,
84, and
66 mV for 2.5, 5, and 10 mM external
K+, respectively).
|
|
2-AR stimulation may also
reduce a Na+ conductance (3). This
effect, along with the increase in
K+ conductance, may contribute to
the outward current observed around the resting membrane potential. We
searched for the presence of a similar mechanism in spinally projecting
A5 neurons by determining the effect of lowering extracellular
Na+ concentration (82%
substitution with NMDG) on the NE-induced response in five cells. No
histology was done in these experiments. The five cells were presumed
to be A5 neurons because they were spinally projecting and located in
the A5 area and all displayed a large outward current in response to
NE, which we considered to have diagnostic value at this stage of the
experiments. As illustrated in Fig.
3A, at a
holding potential close to the resting level (
55 mV),
Na+ substitution produced a small
positive shift in the holding current and reduced the outward current
induced by NE by ~50%. The effect of NMDG on the NE-induced current
was examined in more detail with the slow ramp paradigm illustrated in
Fig. 2, B and
C. The NE-induced current was
determined by subtracting the
I-V
relationships obtained before and during NE application. The NE-induced
current was measured while the slice was perfused in control medium and was remeasured 10 min after the start of perfusion with
low-Na+ medium (Fig.
3B). The two difference curves
(NE-induced current) were very similar except for a reduction in the
outward component of the NE-induced current. This experiment was
replicated four times with a similar outcome. On average, NMDG did not
change the Erev
(
86.1 ± 1.2 mV in control solution; 83.4 ± 1.6 mV in NMDG) nor the magnitude of the inward current (
72.1 ± 8.3 vs.
69.3 ± 6.9 pA measured at
125 mV). However, NMDG
decreased the outward portion of the current (from 20.3 ± 3.1 to
11.2 ± 2.5 pA measured at
55 mV;
P < 0.01 by paired
t-test;
n = 5 cells).
|
Effect of
2-AR
stimulation on A6 cells in the neonate.
We found two types of spinally projecting noradrenergic neurons in the
locus ceruleus. Five cells had low-amplitude, irregular membrane
oscillations similar to those present in A5 neurons (SD of membrane
current of five cells clamped at
55 mV, 3.1 ± 0.4 pA). The
remainder (n = 6 cells) exhibited
large, voltage-independent membrane oscillations at rest (SD of
membrane current at
55 mV, 5.3 ± 0.5 pA). The
large-amplitude regular oscillations of locus ceruleus neurons were
suppressed reversibly by application of 30 µM NE (30 s; experiments
performed in the continuous presence of 1 µM of prazosin; Fig.
4A). To
examine whether application of NE changed the oscillations of the
membrane current recorded in voltage-clamp mode in A5 cells, we
measured the SD of the current 2 min before applying 30 µM NE and
during the 2 min corresponding to the peak of the response to the
catecholamine. The SD of the membrane current (holding potential 56.7 ± 1.9 mV; band pass 0.1-50 Hz; 1 µM TTX present) was
unchanged by the presence of NE (2.9 ± 0.2 vs. 3.0 ± 0.3 pA;
P > 0.05;
n = 17 cells).
|
55 to
135 mV in 1 s). In the six cells that exhibited large-amplitude oscillations, the NE-induced current either did not
reverse within the range of voltages examined
(n = 3; Fig. 4A) or reversed at potentials more
negative than the predicted EK
(Erev less than
114 mV). In the remaining five cells that did not exhibit the
large regular oscillations, the NE-induced current reversed close to
the predicted EK
(Erev
90 ± 1.6 mV; Fig. 4B). The mean
slope conductance (measured between
110 and
130 mV) of
the cells exhibiting the large oscillations (7.0 ± 1.7 nS;
n = 6) tended to be larger than in the
other five neurons (3.7 ± 0.6 nS), but the difference did not reach
statistical significance (P = 0.127).
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The study provides electrophysiological confirmation that A5
noradrenergic neurons have
2-ARs. It is also the first
comparative study of A5 and A6 (locus ceruleus) cells at the same stage
of development. Finally, the study indicates that A5 neurons can be
distinguished from surrounding non-A5 spinally projecting neurons based
on the magnitude of their response to
2-AR stimulation.
A5 cells can be identified by the presence of a larger outward
current in response to
2-receptor stimulation.
As indicated in the companion paper (11a), the intrinsic properties of
A5 cells are not noticeably different from those of the surrounding
nonaminergic bulbospinal cells, at least under the present experimental
conditions. However, the presence of a substantial outward current in
response to 30 µM NE (>15 pA in cells held at
55 mV in
presence of prazosin) had a diagnostic value to identify A5 neurons
within the limited area of the pons that was explored.
2-ARs activate a
K+ conductance
in A5 cells.
Under voltage clamp at or close to the resting membrane potential,
application of NE in the presence of the selective
1-AR antagonist prazosin (32,
33) produced an outward current in all A5 neurons. Subsequent tests
were consistent with the interpretation that the effect of NE was due
to the activation of postsynaptic
2-ARs and that the NE-induced
current resulted predominantly, if not exclusively, from the activation
of an inwardly rectifying K+
conductance.
2-AR antagonist MOI (24). The
NE-induced current reversed polarity in every cell within 2 mV of the
calculated value of the
EK. Also, the
Erev changed
according to the Nernst equation when the concentration of
K+ in the bath was changed from
2.5 to 10 mM. Finally the NE-induced current was attenuated by >90%
by Ba2+, a blocker of inwardly
rectifying K+ channels.
Ba2+ also blocks some
Ca2+-activated
K+ currents, but this type of
current is unlikely to be involved in the response to
2-AR stimulation because, in
neurons, Ca2+ currents
(specifically high voltage-activated currents) are typically inhibited
by
2-AR stimulation, and
2-ARs are not known to
influence phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis (7).
A hyperpolarization-activated current
(Ih) (25) is
present in A5 cells [see companion paper (11a)]. At
potentials more negative than
80 mV, this current is recruited
during the slow ramp voltage-clamp paradigm used to measure the
NE-induced current. However, it is improbable that a significant
portion of the inward current produced by NE at potentials more
negative than
100 mV could be due to activation of
Ih. Indeed, the
expected effect of
2-AR
stimulation in the brain is a reduction in the level of adenosine
3',5'-cyclic monophosphate, and
Ih is thought to
be upregulated by this cyclic nucleotide (25). In addition,
Na+ substitution with NMDG did not
significantly change the inward current produced by NE at
hyperpolarized potentials (Fig. 3B). Finally, in dopaminergic neurons, another group of autoactive catecholaminergic cells, autoreceptor stimulation via
D2 receptors inhibits
Ih, consistent
with the inhibitory effect of autoreceptors (17).
In short, the current produced by
2-AR stimulation in A5 neurons
under our experimental conditions is most likely due to the activation
of an inwardly rectifying K+
conductance.
Differences between A5 and A6 cells.
The NE-induced current always reversed close to
EK in A5 cells,
whereas in ~50% of A6 neurons the NE-induced current reversed at
potentials significantly more negative than
EK or did not
reverse at all. Similar left shifts in the apparent
Erev of the
current induced by opiate agonists have been observed in A6 cells. Two
interpretations of this phenomenon have been proposed, namely, a
space-clamp problem (14, 30) or the additional contribution of an
Na+ conductance to the
opiate-induced response (1, 3, 31). According to the latter theory, A6
cells have a resting Na conductance that is activated by adenosine
3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (2, 4). This conductance would
therefore be reduced by receptors coupled to
Gi/o, such as
2- or µ-opiate receptors, and
this effect would cause the
Erev of the
agonist-induced current to be more hyperpolarized than the
EK (3). In our
hands, the NE-induced current reversed at an abnormally negative
potential only in A6 cells that exhibited large-amplitude oscillations.
Because these oscillations may be due to dendritic coupling (14), our
results tend to support the notion that space-clamp problems or active dendritic conductances could account for the unusually negative Erev of the
NE-induced current. In any event, we found no trace of a similar
anomaly in A5 cells. In these cells, the NE-induced current reversed
close to the calculated
EK, and an 82%
reduction in the extracellular Na+
did not significantly change the
Erev (Fig.
3B).
Na+ substitution with NMDG did not
significantly reduce the inward component of the NE-induced current in
A5 cells, but the outward component was attenuated (Fig. 3). This may
be due to an increased rectification of the
K+ current activated by
2-ARs. Lowering extracellular
Na+ causes intracellular
acidification and a rise in intracellular Ca2+ (18, 26). Intracellular
acidification can change the rectification of some inwardly rectifying
K+ currents either directly or via
changes in the ionization of polyamines (e.g., Ref. 26; for a review,
see Ref. 23).
In summary, A5 and A6 cells display an equally marked sensitivity to
2-AR stimulation, which is
consistent with prior immunohistochemical evidence of
2A-ARs in both cell types
(e.g., Ref. 27). The response of A5 cells is consistent with the
activation of an inwardly rectifying
K+ current, and it resembles
qualitatively and quantitatively that found in about one-half of the
locus ceruleus cells. The response of the other half of the locus
ceruleus neurons is more complex, and the main difference appears
related to the presence or absence of large membrane oscillations that
were not observed in A5 cells. We cannot exclude the possibility that a
different slice configuration or thickness could reveal the presence of
similar oscillations and anomalies of the NE-induced response in A5
cells because both phenomena may reside in distal dendrites (30).
Finally, it should also be kept in mind that the present results were
obtained in a thin slice of neonate brain and that whole cell
recording, as opposed to a perforated-patch technique, was used. It is
unlikely that the major mechanism for A5 cell hyperpolarization by
2-AR agonists (activation of an
inwardly rectifying K+
conductance) would disappear in the adult because it remains in A6
cells. On the other hand, additional membrane effects of
2-AR stimulation could have
been overlooked by the use of the whole cell recording.
Functional significance. The presence
of inhibitory
2-ARs in A5 cells
suggests that, like other groups of aminergic neurons, A5 neurons may
autoregulate their activity or that they are subject to collateral
inhibition by neighboring noradrenergic cells. An other possibility is
that the
2-ARs of A5 cells
mediate the effect of an extrinsic catecholaminergic innervation.
Possible candidates include the C1 or C3 neurons of the medulla
oblongata because terminals immunoreactive for phenylethanolamine
N-methyltransferase are present in the
immediate vicinity of A5 neurons (11).
The A5 noradrenergic cells are the second major group of bulbospinal
neurons with monosynaptic and presumably excitatory projections to
sympathetic preganglionic neurons that have electrophysiologically and
anatomically demonstrated inhibitory
2-ARs. The other cell group is
the C1 adrenergic neurons (19). The inhibition of both A5 and C1 cells
by clonidine and other agents with
2-AR agonist activity is likely
to contribute to the ability of these drugs to decrease sympathetic
tone and arterial pressure. Consistent with this view, both A5 and C1
neurons contain immunoreactivity for the
2A-subtype adrenergic receptor
(10), the integrity of which is required for the efficacy of
clonidine-like hypotensive agents (21).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-28785.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests: P. G. Guyenet, Dept. of Pharmacology, Univ. of Virginia, Box 448 Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, VA 22908.
Received 20 December 1996; accepted in final form 30 July 1997.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Alreja, M.,
and
G. K. Aghajanian.
Pacemaker activity of locus coeruleus neurons: whole-cell recordings in brain slices show dependence on cAMP and protein kinase A.
Brain Res.
556:
339-343,
1991[Medline].
2.
Alreja, M.,
and
G. K. Aghajanian.
Activation of locus coeruleus (LC) neurones by cholera toxin: mediation by cAMP-dependent protein kinase.
Neurosci. Lett.
134:
113-117,
1991[Medline].
3.
Alreja, M.,
and
G. K. Aghajanian.
Opiates suppress a resting sodium-dependent inward current and activate an outward potassium current in locus coeruleus neurons.
J. Neurosci.
13:
3525-3532,
1993[Abstract].
4.
Alreja, M.,
and
G. K. Aghajanian.
Use of the whole-cell patch-clamp method in studies on the role of cAMP in regulating the spontaneous firing of locus coeruleus neurons.
J. Neurosci. Methods
59:
67-75,
1995[Medline].
5.
Andrade, R.,
and
G. K. Aghajanian.
Single cell activity in the noradrenergic A-5 region: responses to drugs and peripheral manipulations of blood pressure.
Brain Res.
242:
125-135,
1982[Medline].
6.
Burnett, A.,
and
G. F. Gebhart.
Characterization of descending modulation of nociception from the A5 cell group.
Brain Res.
546:
271-281,
1991[Medline].
7.
Bylund, D. B.,
J. W. Regan,
J. E. Faber,
J. P. Hieble,
C. R. Triggle,
and
R. R. Ruffolo, Jr.
Vascular alpha-adrenoceptors: from the gene to the human.
Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol.
73:
533-543,
1995[Medline].
8.
Byrum, C. E.,
and
P. G. Guyenet.
Afferent and efferent connections of the A5 noradrenergic cell group in the rat.
J. Comp. Neurol.
261:
529-542,
1987[Medline].
9.
Guyenet, P. G.,
N. Koshiya,
D. Huangfu,
A. J. M. Verberne,
and
T. A. Riley.
Central respiratory control of A5 and A6 pontine noradrenergic neurons.
Am. J. Physiol.
264 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 33):
R1035-R1044,
1993
10.
Guyenet, P. G.,
R. L. Stornetta,
T. Riley,
F. R. Norton,
D. L. Rosin,
and
K. R. Lynch.
Alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptors are present in lower brainstem catecholaminergic and serotonergic neurons innervating spinal cord.
Brain Res.
638:
285-294,
1994[Medline].
11.
Hokfelt, T.,
O. Johansson,
and
M. Goldstein.
Central catecholamine neurons as revealed by immunohistochemistry with special reference to adrenaline neurons.
In: Handbook of Chemical Neuroanatomy. Classical Transmitters in the CNS, edited by A. Bjorklund,
and T. Hokfelt. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1984, vol. 2, pt. 1, p. 157-276.
11a.
Huangfu, D.,
and
P. G. Guyenet.
Autoactivity of A5 neurons: role of subthreshold oscillations and persistent Na+ current.
Am. J. Physiol.
273 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 42):
H2280-H2289,
1997
12.
Huangfu, D.,
L. J. Hwang,
T. A. Riley,
and
P. G. Guyenet.
Splanchnic nerve response to A5-area stimulation in rats.
Am. J. Physiol.
263 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 32):
R437-R446,
1992
13.
Huangfu, D.,
N. Koshiya,
and
P. G. Guyenet.
A5 noradrenergic unit activity and sympathetic nerve discharge in rats.
Am. J. Physiol.
261 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 30):
R393-R402,
1991
14.
Ishimatsu, M.,
and
J. T. Williams.
Synchronous activity in locus coeruleus results from dendritic interactions in pericoerulear regions.
J. Neurosci.
16:
5196-5204,
1996
15.
Jansen, A. S. P.,
X. V. Nguyen,
V. Karpitskiy,
T. C. Mettenleiter,
and
A. D. Loewy.
Central command neurons of the sympathetic nervous system: basis of the fight or flight response.
Science
270:
644-646,
1995
16.
Jansen, A. S. P.,
M. W. Wessendorf,
and
A. D. Loewy.
Transneuronal labeling of CNS neuropeptide and monoamine neurons after pseudorabies virus injections into the stellate ganglion.
Brain Res.
683:
1-24,
1995[Medline].
17.
Jiang, Z. G.,
M. Pessia,
and
R. A. North.
Dopamine and baclofen inhibit the hyperpolarization-activated cation current in rat ventral tegmental neurons.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
462:
753-764,
1993
18.
Koch, R. A.,
and
M. E. Barish.
Perturbation of intracellular calcium and hydrogen ion regulation in cultured mouse hippocampal neurons by reduction of the sodium ion concentration gradient.
J. Neurosci.
14:
2585-2593,
1994[Abstract].
19.
Li, Y. W.,
D. A. Bayliss,
and
P. G. Guyenet.
C1 neurons of neonatal rats: intrinsic beating properties and
2-adrenergic receptors.
Am. J. Physiol.
269 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 38):
R1356-R1369,
1995
20.
Li, Y. W.,
and
P. G. Guyenet.
Angiotensin II decreases a resting K+ conductance in rat bulbospinal neurons of the C1 area.
Circ. Res.
78:
274-282,
1996
21.
MacMillan, L. B.,
L. Hein,
M. S. Smith,
M. T. Piascik,
and
L. E. Limbird.
Central hypotensive effects of the
2a-adrenergic receptor subtype.
Science
273:
801-803,
1996[Abstract].
22.
Neil, J. J.,
and
A. D. Loewy.
Decreases in blood pressure in response to L-glutamate microinjections into the A5 catecholamine cell group.
Brain Res.
241:
271-278,
1982[Medline].
23.
Nichols, C. G.,
and
A. N. Lopatin.
Inward rectifier potassium channels.
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
59:
171-191,
1997[Medline].
24.
O'Rourke, M. F.,
H. S. Blaxall,
L. L. Iversen,
and
D. B. Bylund.
Characterization of [3H]RX821002 binding to alpha-2 adrenergic receptor subtypes.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
268:
1362-1367,
1994
25.
Pape, H. C.
Queer current and pacemaker: the hyperpolarization-activated cation current in neurons.
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
58:
299-327,
1996[Medline].
26.
Pineda, J.,
and
G. K. Aghajanian.
Carbon dioxide regulates the tonic activity of locus coeruleus neurons by modulating a proton- and polyamine-sensitive inward rectifier potassium current.
Neuroscience
77:
723-743,
1997[Medline].
27.
Rosin, D. L.,
D. Zeng,
R. L. Stornetta,
F. R. Norton,
T. Riley,
M. D. Okusa,
P. G. Guyenet,
and
K. R. Lynch.
Immunohistochemical localization of alpha 2A-adrenergic receptors in catecholaminergic and other brainstem neurons in the rat.
Neuroscience
56:
139-155,
1993[Medline].
28.
Stanek, K. A.,
J. J. Neil,
W. B. Sawyer,
and
A. D. Loewy.
Changes in regional blood flow and cardiac output after L-glutamate stimulation of A5 cell group.
Am J. Physiol.
246 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 15):
H44-H51,
1984.
29.
Strack, A. M.,
W. B. Sawyer,
K. B. Platt,
and
A. D. Loewy.
CNS cell groups regulating the sympathetic outflow to adrenal gland as revealed by transneuronal cell body labeling with pseudorabies virus.
Brain Res.
491:
274-296,
1989[Medline].
30.
Travagli, R. A.,
T. V. Dunwiddie,
and
J. T. Williams.
Opioid inhibition in locus coeruleus.
J. Neurophysiol.
74:
518-528,
1995[Abstract].
31.
Wang, Y. Y.,
and
G. K. Aghajanian.
Excitation of locus coeruleus neurons by an adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate-activated inward current: extracellular and intracellular studies in rat brain slices.
Synapse
1:
481-487,
1987[Medline].
32.
Williams, J. T.,
and
R. A. North.
Catecholamine inhibition of calcium action potentials in rat locus coeruleus neurones.
Neuroscience
14:
103-109,
1985[Medline].
33.
Yoshimura, M.,
C. Polosa,
and
S. Nishi.
Slow EPSP and the depolarizing action of noradrenaline on sympathetic preganglionic neurons.
Brain Res.
414:
138-142,
1987[Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-C. Viemari, M. Bevengut, P. Coulon, and G. Hilaire Nasal Trigeminal Inputs Release the A5 Inhibition Received by the Respiratory Rhythm Generator of the Mouse Neonate J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2004; 91(2): 746 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hayar and P. G. Guyenet alpha 2-Adrenoceptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition in bulbospinal neurons of rostral ventrolateral medulla Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 1999; 277(3): H1069 - H1080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Huangfu and P. G. Guyenet Autoactivity of A5 neurons: role of subthreshold oscillations and persistent Na+ current Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 1997; 273(5): H2280 - H2289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |