AJP - Heart Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 273: H2620-H2626, 1997;
0363-6135/97 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kooner, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mathias, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kooner, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mathias, C. J.
Vol. 273, Issue 6, H2620-H2626, December 1997

Separation of peripheral and central cardiovascular actions of angiotensin II

Jaspal S. Kooner1, Clive N. May2, Stanley Peart3, and Christopher J. Mathias3

1 Department of Medicine, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom; 2 Howard Florey Institute of Physiology and Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia; and 3 Department of Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital Medical School, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The pressor and vasoconstrictor action of angiotensin II (ANG II) is considered to be caused by a combination of its direct and indirect vascular effects, the latter mediated by the sympathetic nervous system. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which the direct and indirect actions of ANG II contribute to its pressor and vascular effects. Blood pressure, cutaneous vascular, and plasma norepinephrine responses to intravenous ANG II were measured in conscious rabbits before and after inhibition of central sympathetic outflow with intravenous and intracisternal clonidine and after ganglionic blockade with intravenous pentolinium. Intravenous ANG II caused a similar dose-related rise in blood pressure before and after sympathetic blockade with intravenous clonidine, intracisternal clonidine, and intravenous pentolinium. In contrast, the dose-related fall in cutaneous ear blood flow and cutaneous ear temperature and rise in cutaneous ear vascular resistance induced by intravenous ANG II were abolished after intravenous clonidine, intracisternal clonidine, and intravenous pentolinium. Heart rate was unchanged after ANG II. There were no changes in back skin or rectal temperature. There was a nonsignificant fall in plasma norepinephrine and no change in epinephrine after ANG II. These results demonstrate that the acute pressor response to intravenous ANG II is mediated by its direct vascular effects and is not dependent on central or ganglionic stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system, in contrast to the effect of ANG II on cutaneous ear vasoconstriction, which is predominantly caused by a centrally mediated increase in sympathetic nervous activity. Our results separate, in conscious rabbits, the direct vascular effects of ANG II from its indirect vascular actions, which are mediated by central sympathetic stimulation in the brain.

blood pressure; cutaneous blood flow; direct vascular effect; sympathetic nervous system

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

ANGIOTENSIN II (ANG II) plays an important role in the physiological regulation of vascular tone and blood pressure and in pathological conditions such as hypertension and heart failure. The mechanism by which ANG II exerts its vasoconstrictor and pressor actions remains uncertain. Results from previous studies have suggested a direct action of ANG II on vascular smooth muscle (28) and an indirect effect resulting in increased sympathetic nervous activity. The latter includes a centrally mediated action (29), facilitation of ganglionic transmission (31), potentiation of norepinephrine release from nerve endings (38), and inhibition of norepinephrine reuptake from the synaptic cleft (14).

Previous studies have shown that the pressor and vasoconstrictor responses to intravenous ANG II are attenuated after ganglionic blockade with hexamethonium (9), suggesting that the sympathetic nervous system contributes significantly to the pressor and vasoconstrictor actions of ANG II. However, the fall in circulating catecholamines (5, 33) and reduction in regional sympathetic activity (10, 20) after ANG II in various species argue against an important role for the sympathetic nervous system in the pressor action of ANG II.

We studied the extent to which the direct and indirect actions of ANG II contribute to its vascular and pressor effects after incremental infusions of intravenous ANG II. Blood pressure, cutaneous vascular, and plasma norepinephrine responses to intravenous ANG II were measured in conscious rabbits before and after inhibition of central sympathetic outflow with intravenous clonidine. To ensure that the reduction in sympathetic nervous activity after intravenous clonidine was caused solely by its central action, additional studies were performed after intracisternal administration of clonidine at a dose that was ineffective when administered intravenously. The effects of ANG II were also examined after ganglionic blockade with intravenous pentolinium, to exclude an action on sympathetic pathways not affected by clonidine.

    METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Experiments were performed on seven male Sandy Half-Lop rabbits (National Institute for Medical Research, London, UK) with free access to food (RHM-R14, Labsure Animal Diets) and water. Animals weighed between 2.8 and 3.4 kg.

Surgical procedure. A cisternal catheter was inserted into the cisterna magna under Saffan general anesthesia as described previously (22). Injections were given in 25 µl of sterile, nonpyrogenic, isotonic saline using a sterilized Hamilton syringe with a 30-gauge needle. This was flushed with 20 µl of saline; the dead volume of the catheter was 10 µl. The injection site was confirmed at the end of a series of experiments by injection of 25 µl of bromophenol blue (1%) followed by 20 µl of saline. The animal was killed with an overdose of pentobarbital sodium, and the distribution of dye was examined.

Experimental protocol. Animals were not used for at least 7 days postsurgery. By this time, parameters of heart rate, blood pressure, respiration rate, and plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine have returned to normal levels. Before each experiment cannulas were inserted into the central artery and marginal vein of the ear under 1% lidocaine (International Medical Systems) local anesthesia. The arterial cannula was connected to a pressure transducer (Bell and Howell), and blood pressure and heart rate were recorded on a Devices polygraph. The venous cannula was used for the infusion of drugs. The laser Doppler probe and temperature thermistor were placed on the opposite ear. Insertion of cannulas caused a transient rise in heart rate and blood pressure lasting <5 min in all animals. The rabbits were left undisturbed for ~60 min, until steady baselines were reached. Four basal measurements were then made at 5-min intervals, after which ANG II (Hypertensin, Ciba) was infused intravenously at incremental doses (0.001, 0.01, and 0.05 µg · kg-1 · min-1) for 10 min at each dose. After the last infusion, 15 min were allowed for blood pressure to return to basal levels, after which clonidine hydrochloride (15 µg/kg, Boehringer) was infused intravenously over 10 min. A further 20 min were allowed before ANG II infusions were restarted. Experiments were repeated, on separate days and in random order, in all seven animals, using intracisternal clonidine (1 µg/kg) and intravenous pentolinium tartrate (15 mg/kg, May and Baker) in place of intravenous clonidine. At the end of each experiment, adequacy of sympathetic blockade was tested by the ability of intravenous and intracisternal clonidine and intravenous pentolinium to completely inhibit sympathetic activation induced by intravenous morphine at a dose of 4 mg/kg (22, 23). Animals were lightly restrained through the experiment. Room temperature was maintained at 23 ± 1°C.

Cutaneous ear blood flow and vascular resistance. Continuous measurements of skin blood flow were made using a laser Doppler flowmeter (Periflux model PF2b, Perimed; Ref. 4). The probe was placed on a shaved area, ~1 cm lateral to the central ear artery, on the ventral surface of the ear, using a plastic holder held in place by double-sided adhesive tape. This did not affect baseline measurements. Cutaneous ear vascular resistance was derived from the ratio of blood pressure and cutaneous ear blood flow.

Temperature measurements. Cutaneous temperatures were measured, as additional estimates of cutaneous blood flow, on shaved areas of the ear, adjacent to the laser Doppler probe, and on the back skin, adjacent to the spine (Panlab). Rectal temperature was measured using a rectal temperature probe (Digimed).

Blood collection and analysis. Blood (2.5 ml) was collected from the arterial cannula into cooled tubes containing 50 µl of ethylene glycol-bis(beta -aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid (0.095%)-glutathione (0.06%) for measurement of plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine. The tubes were kept on ice until centrifugation at 4°C, and plasma was stored at -70°C until assay. Catecholamines were separated by high-pressure liquid chromatography and detected electrochemically (21).

Data analysis. Data are presented as means ± SE. Analysis was performed using the SAS statistical programme (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). For the cardiovascular variables, the control value consisted of the mean of the four readings taken during the control period. A logarithmic transformation was performed on the values for norepinephrine and epinephrine before analysis. The data were subjected to analysis of variance, and where the null hypothesis was rejected Scheffé's comparisons were performed separately on responses to ANG II before and after intravenous clonidine, intracisternal clonidine, and intravenous pentolinium. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Blood pressure. ANG II caused a dose-related rise in blood pressure in each animal (Fig. 1, Tables 1-3). Blood pressure fell after intravenous clonidine, intracisternal clonidine, and intravenous pentolinium, after which ANG II induced a similar dose-related rise in blood pressure. The increase in blood pressure after each dose of ANG II was not reduced by intravenous clonidine, intracisternal clonidine, or intravenous pentolinium. Intravenous morphine did not induce any further significant changes in mean blood pressure after intravenous clonidine [62 ± 4 to 66 ± 5 mmHg, P = not significant (NS)], intracisternal clonidine (76 ± 4 to 77 ± 6 mmHg, P = NS), or intravenous pentolinium (70 ± 3 to 69 ± 6 mmHg, P = NS) at end of experiments.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Change in mean blood pressure (MBP) in response to incremental doses of angiotensin II before and after intravenous (iv) clonidine (Clon) (A), intracisternal (ic) Clon (B), and iv pentolinium (Pent) (C). * P < 0.05 compared with corresponding value before ic Clon.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Hemodynamic and plasma norepinephrine responses to intravenous ANG II before and after intravenous clonidine

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Hemodynamic and PNE responses to intravenous ANG II before and after intracisternal Clon

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.   Hemodynamic and PNE responses to intravenous ANG II before and after intravenous pentolinium

Heart rate. ANG II did not induce significant changes in heart rate before or after intravenous clonidine, intracisternal clonidine, or intravenous pentolinium (Tables 1-3).

Cutaneous ear blood flow and vascular resistance. ANG II caused dose-related fall in cutaneous ear blood flow and rise in vascular resistance (Fig. 2, Tables 1-3). Cutaneous ear blood flow increased and vascular resistance fell after intravenous clonidine, intracisternal clonidine, and intravenous pentolinium. ANG II did not lower ear blood flow or raise ear vascular resistance after intravenous clonidine, intracisternal clonidine, or intravenous pentolinium.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Change in laser Doppler resistance (LDR) in response to incremental doses of angiotensin II before and after iv Clon (A), ic Clon (B), and iv Pent (C). * P < 0.05 compared with corresponding values before iv Clon, ic Clon, and iv Pent.

Cutaneous temperatures. Before intravenous clonidine, intracisternal clonidine, and intravenous pentolinium, ANG II reduced ear temperature but did not influence back skin or rectal temperature (Table 4). Intravenous clonidine, intracisternal clonidine, and intravenous pentolinium increased ear temperature but not back or rectal temperatures. ANG II did not change temperature at any site after intravenous clonidine, intracisternal clonidine, or intravenous pentolinium.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4.   Ear, back, and rectal temperature responses to intravenous ANG II before and after intravenous Clon, intracisternal Clon, and intravenous Pent

Plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine. There were no consistent changes in plasma norepinephrine in response to ANG II (Fig. 3; Tables 1-3). Plasma norepinephrine fell significantly in response to ANG II in the first experiment before intravenous clonidine only. Plasma norepinephrine fell after intravenous clonidine, intracisternal clonidine, and after intravenous pentolinium. ANG II lowered plasma norepinephrine after intracisternal clonidine but did not induce any significant changes in norepinephrine after intravenous clonidine or intravenous pentolinium. Plasma epinephrine did not change in response to ANG II before intravenous clonidine (0.16 ± 0.03 to 0.12 ± 0.07 nmol / l, P = NS), intracisternal clonidine (0.13 ± 0.03 to 0.15 ± 0.06 nmol / l, P = NS), or intravenous pentolinium (0.16 ± 0.07 to 0.13 ± 0.04 nmol / l, P = NS). There was a nonsignificant fall in plasma epinephrine after intravenous clonidine, intracisternal clonidine, and intravenous pentolinium. ANG II did not induce any further changes in epinephrine after intravenous clonidine (0.10 ± 0.06 to 0.09 ± 0.05 nmol / l, P = NS), intracisternal clonidine (0.09 ± 0.02 to 0.12 ± 0.07 nmol / l, P = NS), or intravenous pentolinium (0.08 ± 0.04 to 0.10 ± 0.05 nmol / l, P = NS).


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Percent change in MBP (A), LDR (B), and norepinephrine (C), after iv Clon, ic Clon, and iv Pent compared with basal values.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Results of the present study suggest that the sympathetic nervous system is not the primary mediator of the acute pressor response to intravenous ANG II and contrast with its constrictor action on cutaneous ear vessels, which is primarily caused by an effect of ANG II on the brain, resulting in activation of the sympathetic nervous system. These results separate, in resting conscious rabbits, the direct vascular and indirect effects of intravenous ANG II.

The physiological mechanisms that mediate the pressor response of ANG II include a direct vasoconstrictor action, release of vasopressin (2, 11, 12), attenuation of the cardiac baroreflex (10), and activation of the sympathetic nervous system by an action at nerve endings (1, 38), autonomic ganglia (31), and the brain (6, 7, 13, 37). In this study using conscious animals, we have shown that ANG II induced a similar rise in blood pressure, before and after central sympathetic blockade with intravenous and intracisternal clonidine (15, 16, 30), the latter at a dose that is ineffective when given intravenously, and after ganglionic blockade with intravenous pentolinium. Adequacy of sympathetic blockade was confirmed at the end of each experiment by the ability of intravenous and intracisternal clonidine and intravenous pentolinium to abolish the pressor response to intravenous morphine caused by an increase in sympathoadrenal outflow (21-23). Our findings demonstrate that in resting, conscious rabbits the acute pressor response to intravenous infusion of ANG II is predominantly caused by its direct action on blood vessels, and they fail to provide evidence for a significant interaction of ANG II with the sympathetic nervous system. These findings are in accord with those of Cox and Bishop (5), who showed that ganglionic blockade does not abolish the acute, unlike the chronic, pressor effect of ANG II. It should be emphasized that these results apply to rabbits in the resting situation and cannot be extrapolated to animals under heightened sympathetic drive, in which effects of ANG II may be modulated differently by sympathetic activation. A possible role of vasopressin release in the pressor response to ANG II, however, cannot be excluded by the present study.

An interaction of the sympathetic nervous system in the pressor response to ANG II has been suggested by studies reporting attenuation of the pressor response to a bolus injection of ANG II after ganglionic blockade in conscious dogs (9) and after phentolamine in conscious rabbits (34). However, in the study by Fujii and Vatner (9), only transient hemodynamic responses, with peak changes occurring within 1 min, were determined in response to a bolus injection of ANG II. The presence of a bradycardia after bolus ANG II, not generally seen after ANG II infusion or in this study, suggests that hemodynamic responses to ANG II may be influenced by the rate and/or concentration at which ANG II reaches its target sites. Similarly, in the study by Rowe et al. (34), attenuation of the pressor response to ANG II after phentolamine only occurred at the highest (3 µg) bolus dose of ANG II. Paradoxically, the same investigators noted an accentuation of the pressor response to ANG II (3 µg) after ganglionic blockade with hexamethonium. The pressor response to ANG II was unchanged before and after phentolamine or hexamethonium (34), at doses comparable to those used in the present study. Additional evidence supporting involvement of the sympathetic nervous system has come from observations of a higher blood pressure rise after intravertebral or intracerebroventricular ANG II compared with a similar dose administered intravenously (37). This may be caused in part by a specific stimulatory action of ANG II on circumventricular organs such as the area postrema (5, 27) at higher doses. This effect was not contributory in the present study, however, because the ANG II-induced blood pressure rise was similar before and after sympathetic blockade.

Evidence from previous studies suggests that the pressor effect of intravenous ANG II is primarily caused by its vasoconstrictor action on the renal and splanchnic vascular beds, with little effect on the skeletal muscle vasculature (3, 8, 26). These effects are likely to be caused by a direct vascular action of ANG II and to differ from its vasoconstrictor action in the human hand, which is mediated by its indirect effects (17), although the site of this action is not known. Cutaneous blood vessels of the rabbit ear resemble those in the human hand, with an abundance of arteriovenous anastomosis regulated predominantly by sympathetic vasoconstrictor nerves (16, 32, 37). In this study, cutaneous vascular responses on the rabbit ear and back were determined to investigate whether the indirect actions of ANG II, mediated by the sympathetic nervous system, could be separated from its direct vascular effects.

Intravenous ANG II caused dose-related fall in blood flow and cutaneous ear temperature and rise in vascular resistance, indicating vasoconstriction in the cutaneous ear vessels opposite to the site of ANG II infusion. This response is likely to have been mediated centrally, although a possible effect of ANG II on receptors in that ear and, as a result, on the nervous system innervation of the ipsilateral and contralateral ear, cannot be excluded by this study. ANG II did not influence back skin temperature, suggesting lack of change in blood flow to this region. However, direct measurements of blood flow to the back, and other regional vascular beds, were not made and remain a limitation of this study. Clonidine and pentolinium reduced ear vascular resistance, indicating that the vascular tone was maintained by sympathetic mechanisms. The constrictor effect of intravenous ANG II on cutaneous ear vessels was abolished after central sympathetic blockade after intravenous and intracisternal clonidine and after ganglionic blockade with intravenous pentolinium, despite the vessel's potential to constrict in the dilated state after direct administration of ANG II or norepinephrine (18, 35, 36). Our results demonstrate that cutaneous ear vasoconstriction after intravenous ANG II is dependent on its action on the brain, increasing sympathetic nervous activity to the ear, and excludes a direct vascular effect of ANG II on rabbit ear vessels. In contrast, the pressor response to infusion of ANG II depended on its direct vascular actions, and there was no evidence supporting a role for the sympathetic nervous system. As well as being of direct physiological interest, this finding provides a minimally invasive means of investigating the central mechanisms of action of ANG II in conscious animals.

The specific sites at which ANG II acts to cause vasoconstriction in the cutaneous vessels of the ear of the rabbit or in the human hand are unknown. Observations that the effects of intravenous ANG II on hand blood flow are absent in the denervated limbs of patients with unilateral brachial plexus injury who have a postganglionic lesion (17) and in a patient with chronic cervical spinal cord transection with a preganglionic lesion (36) imply that the effect of ANG II on human hand blood flow is dependent on a central action of ANG II, presumably on the circumventricular organs. In the rabbit, angiotensin binding sites are found in the circumventricular organs, in the anterior wall of the third ventricle, and in the area postrema in the brain stem (25). There is evidence from studies with c-fos (24) and studies on the effects of lesions (5, 19) that ANG II acts on both these regions, suggesting that these circumventricular organs could mediate the effect of circulating ANG II on ear blood flow.

Our results demonstrate that the acute pressor response to intravenous ANG II is mediated by its direct vascular effects and is not dependent on the indirect, sympathetically mediated actions of ANG II. The pressor response to intravenous ANG II contrasts with its specific action on cutaneous ear vessels, which is caused entirely by an effect of ANG II in the brain resulting in activation of the sympathetic nervous system. These results separate, in conscious rabbits, the direct vascular effects of ANG II from its indirect sympathetically mediated actions, which induce a selective increase in sympathetic vasoconstrictor activity in cutaneous ear vessels.

    FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests: J. S. Kooner, Cardiology Div., Dept. of Medicine, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Rd., London W12 0NN, UK.

Received 23 July 1996; accepted in final form 31 July 1997.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1.   Allen, A. M., S. Y. Chai, J. Clevers, M. J. McKinley, G. Paxinos, and F. A. Mendelsohn. Localization and characterization of angiotensin II receptor binding and angiotensin converting enzyme in the human medulla oblongata. J. Comp. Neurol. 269: 249-264, 1988[Medline].

2.   Barron, K. W., A. J. Trapani, F. J. Gordon, and M. J. Brody. Baroreceptor denervation profoundly enhances cardiovascular responses to central angiotensin II. Am. J. Physiol. 257 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 26): H314-H323, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3.   Batin, P., S. M. Gardiner, A. M. Compton, and T. Bennett. Differential regional haemodynamic effects of the non-peptide angiotensin II antagonist, DuP 753, in water-replete and water-deprived Brattleboro rats. Life Sci. 48: 733-739, 1991[Medline].

4.   Coffman, J. D. Effects of endothelium-derived nitric oxide on skin and digital blood flow in humans. Am. J. Physiol. 267 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 36): H2087-H2090, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

5.   Cox, B. F., and V. S. Bishop. Neural and humoral mechanisms of angiotensin-dependent hypertension. Am. J. Physiol. 261 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 30): H1284-H1291, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6.   Ferrario, C. M., C. J. Dickinson, and J. W. McCubbin. Central vasomotor stimulation by angiotensin. Clin. Sci. (Lond.) 39: 239-245, 1970[Medline].

7.   Fink, G. D., C. A. Bruner, and M. L. Mangiapane. Area postrema is critical for angiotensin-induced hypertension in rats. Hypertension 9: 355-361, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].

8.   Forsyth, R. P., B. I. Hoffbrand, and K. L. Melmon. Hemodynamic effects of angiotensin in normal and environmentally stressed monkeys. Circulation 44: 119-129, 1971[Abstract/Free Full Text].

9.   Fujii, A. M., and S. F. Vatner. Direct versus indirect pressor and vasoconstrictor actions of angiotensin in conscious dogs. Hypertension 7: 253-261, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10.   Guo, G. B., and F. M. Abboud. Angiotensin II attenuates baroreflex control of heart rate and sympathetic activity. Am. J. Physiol. 246 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 15): H80-H89, 1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].

11.   Harland, D., S. M. Gardiner, and T. Bennett. Cardiovascular and dipsogenic effects of angiotensin II administered i.c.v. in Long-Evans and Brattleboro rats. Brain Res. 455: 58-64, 1988[Medline].

12.   Hogarty, D. C., E. A. Speakman, V. Puig, and M. I. Phillips. The role of angiotensin, AT1 and AT2 receptors in the pressor, drinking and vasopressin responses to central angiotensin. Brain Res. 586: 289-294, 1992[Medline].

13.   Joy, M. D., and R. D. Lowe. Evidence that the area postrema mediates the central cardiovascular response to angiotensin II. Nature 228: 1303-1304, 1970[Medline].

14.   Khairallah, P. A. Action of angiotensin on adrenergic nerve endings: inhibition of norepinephrine uptake. Federation Proc. 31: 1351-1357, 1972[Medline].

15.   Kobinger, W., and A. Walland. Investigations into the mechanism of the hypotensive effect of 2-(2,6-dichlorphenylamino)-2-imidazoline-HCl. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2: 155-162, 1967[Medline].

16.   Kooner, J. S., R. Birch, H. L. Frankel, W. S. Peart, and C. J. Mathias. Hemodynamic and neurohormonal effects of clonidine in patients with preganglionic and postganglionic sympathetic lesions. Evidence for a central sympatholytic action. Circulation 84: 75-83, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

17.   Kooner, J. S., R. Birch, W. S. Peart, and C. J. Mathias. Angiotensin-II induces differential changes in innervated and denervated limbs of patients with unilateral brachial plexus injury (Abstract). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 21: 259A, 1993.

18.   Linder, J. Cerebral and ocular blood flow during alpha 2-blockade: evidence for a modulated sympathetic response. Acta Physiol. Scand. 113: 511-517, 1981[Medline].

19.   Matsukawa, S., and I. A. Reid. Role of the area postrema in the modulation of the baroreflex control of heart rate by angiotensin II. Circ. Res. 67: 1462-1473, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

20.   Matsumura, Y., E. M. Hasser, and V. S. Bishop. Central effect of angiotensin II on baroreflex regulation in conscious rabbits. Am. J. Physiol. 256 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 25): R694-R700, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

21.   May, C. N., I. W. Ham, K. E. Heslop, F. A. Stone, and C. J. Mathias. Intravenous morphine causes hypertension, hyperglycaemia and increases sympatho-adrenal outflow in conscious rabbits. Clin. Sci. (Lond.) 75: 71-77, 1988[Medline].

22.   May, C. N., C. J. Whitehead, M. R. Dashwood, and C. J. Mathias. Investigation of the central sites at which morphine acts to cause hypertension in conscious rabbits. Br. J. Pharmacol. 97: 873-881, 1989[Medline].

23.   May, C. N., C. J. Whitehead, K. E. Heslop, and C. J. Mathias. Evidence that intravenous morphine stimulates central opiate receptors to increase sympatho-adrenal outflow and cause hypertension in conscious rabbits. Clin. Sci. (Lond.) 76: 431-437, 1989[Medline].

24.   McKinley, M. J., E. Badoer, L. Vivas, and B. J. Oldfield. Comparison of c-fos expression in the lamina terminalis of conscious rats after intravenous or intracerebroventricular angiotensin. Brain Res. Bull. 37: 131-137, 1995[Medline].

25.   Mendelsohn, F. A. Localization and properties of angiotensin receptors. J. Hypertens. 3: 307-316, 1985[Medline].

26.   Osei, S. Y., R. S. Ahima, R. K. Minkes, J. P. Weaver, M. C. Khosla, and P. J. Kadowitz. Differential responses to angiotensin-(1---7) in the feline mesenteric and hindquarters vascular beds. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 234: 35-42, 1993[Medline].

27.   Otsuka, A., K. L. Barnes, and C. M. Ferrario. Contribution of area postrema to pressor actions of angiotensin II in dog. Am. J. Physiol. 251 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 20): H538-H546, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text].

28.   Page, I. H., and F. M. Bumpus. Angiotensin. Physiol. Rev. 41: 331-390, 1961[Free Full Text].

29.   Reid, I. A., V. L. Brooks, C. D. Rudolph, and L. C. Keil. Analysis of the actions of angiotensin on the central nervous system of conscious dogs. Am. J. Physiol. 243 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 12): R82-R91, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].

30.   Reid, J. L., L. M. Wing, C. J. Mathias, H. L. Frankel, and E. Neill. The central hypotensive effect of clonidine. Studies in tetraplegic subjects. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 21: 375-381, 1977[Medline].

31.   Reit, E. Actions of angiotensin on the adrenal medulla and autonomic ganglia. Federation Proc. 31: 1338-1343, 1972[Medline].

32.   Roddie, I. C. Circulation to the skin and adipose tissue. In: Handbook of Physiology. The Cardiovascular System. Peripheral Circulation and Organ Blood Flow. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1983, sect. 2, vol. III, pt. 1, chapt. 10, p. 285-317.

33.   Rowe, B. P., and A. Nasjletti. The effect of angiotensin II infusion on plasma catecholamines in the conscious rabbit. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 168: 110-113, 1981[Abstract].

34.   Rowe, B. P., A. R. Noble, and K. A. Munday. Blockade of pressor responses to angiotensins I and II and noradrenaline using phentolamine, propranolol and hexamethonium in conscious rabbits. Pflügers Arch. 382: 269-274, 1979[Medline].

35.   Scroop, G. C., J. A. Walsh, and R. F. Whelan. A comparison of the effects of intra-arterial and intravenous infusions of angiotensin and noradrenaline on the circulation in man. Clin. Sci. (Lond.) 29: 315-326, 1965[Medline].

36.   Scroop, G. C., and R. F. Whelan. A central vasomotor action of angiotensin in man. Clin. Sci. (Lond.) 30: 79-90, 1966[Medline].

37.   Yu, R., and C. J. Dickinson. The progressive pressor response to angiotensin in the rabbit: the role of the sympathetic nervous system. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. Ther. 191: 24-36, 1971[Medline].

38.   Zimmerman, B. G., and L. Whitmore. Effect of angiotensin and phenoxybenzamine on release of norepinephrine in vessels during sympathetic nerve stimulation. Int. J. Neuropharmacol. 6: 27-38, 1967[Medline].


AJP Heart Circ Physiol 273(6):H2620-H2626
0363-6135/97 $5.00 Copyright © 1997 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
L. Xu and A. F. Sved
Acute sympathoexcitatory action of angiotensin II in conscious baroreceptor-denervated rats
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2002; 283(2): R451 - R459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kooner, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mathias, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kooner, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mathias, C. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online